This morning I had the Deardorff set up for a group shot at work. One of the guys looked under the dark cloth and remarked "It's in color!" Couldn't help but laugh, he's a good friend.
Michael - Check with Edgar Praus in Rochester, NY - http://www.4photolab.com/pricing/. I have been using him since i shut down my wet lab. (You got a film dryer from me many years ago).
Chrome was located in D.C. and Dodge Color used to be located in Bethesda, across the street from the Washington School of Photography (which I think has also relocated). They joined up as one company several years ago and moved to an office park in north Silver Spring. I used them when I still lived in Maryland. They do good work.
Mike Lewis
mikelewisimages.com
And indeed, I still have said film dryer. It is a wonderful piece from California Steel. Love it. I'm leaning toward getting a C41 kit just to say I did it myself. But having never developed color, I'm not sure just how complicated it will be. But I'm determined to try. But I'm starting with a couple of rolls of 120 before I drop 15-dollar sheets of film into the drink.
C-41 isn't any more difficult than souping your first b&w roll. It's just a different temperature and the ingredients smell funny.
Thing is, it's not B&W. As long as you can resist that line of thinking, you should be OK. What I mean by that is that the parameters are not variables. They are fixed. Not negotiable. Use the correct temperature, use the exact times specified. You can't control C-41. Even a one stop push can be problematic.
This is antithetical to our normal B&W development ideas -- that we can have N-, N, and N+ development times, and can move highlight density around, etc. With C-41, you can't. And if you try, all hell breaks loose. I'm talking about color shifts (like variable color casts) that you can't easily, or at all, fix. Certainly not in a darkroom print. And almost certainly not in Photoshop.
So if you can just quit thinking, and follow the instructions to the letter, you'll be fine.
Goes without saying.
The other thing is, read up on the process. There's lingering controversy over the kits. Some of them combine bleach and fix. There are religious fights over this. It would appear that a majority of opinion is that separate bleach and fix steps are better. But of course separate bleach and fix baths are hard to find in kits for home use because making a blix is easier (that is, cheaper) for Tetenal, Unicolor, etc. who are making the small kits.
There's a ton of information over on APUG. They've covered the C-41 ground quite thoroughly I think. For example:
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum40/5...emicals-2.html
Read particularly post #11. Poster "Photo Engineer" is a retired Kodak research chemist. He knows whereof he speaks, and he's still a very active poster on APUG.
I don't mean to make it sound harder than it is. Learning C-41 isn't any worse than learning how to use a view camera. You'll be fine.
Bruce Watson
With C-41, it's not hard... You just have to "nail" the camera exposure (at the box speed), get temps exact (water bath everything and keep within a 10th of a degree), the times exact, follow the instructions exactly, and it comes out GREAT!!!!
If there is still a local minilab near you, they will sometimes sell you paper and chem at a great price...
Steve K
Bookmarks