Originally Posted by
Marco Gilardetti
So, in simple words (correct me if I'm wrong), one can't simply put the MTF graphs of the S and the N side by side and compare, correct? Actually, just by looking at the curves and ignoring the 1:20 1:10 thing, the N would seem to be slightly better than the S, which I don't think it may really be as it is described in the foreword as a "good option on a budget".
So, how does the performance of the two lenses (and the two MTF set of curves) compare? Does the 1:20 vs 1:10 thing mean that the S is almost on another planet, or just slightly better than the N?
Bookmarks