8x10
4x5
Other size, please specify
"Less is more."
-Robert Browning
"More is more."
-Dolly Parton
Thank you all. I read all your comments a long time ago and just came back to read through them all again. I've shot a lot more, both film and digital, and I've realised how much I value portability. The idea of a camera that can fit in a rucksack and could be taken around with me as much as possible is a huge plus. I'm not ruling out 8x10, but I think 5x4 is they way to go now - I still haven't bought an LF camera yet.
I'm currently looking for a good deal on a press camera. Maybe a speed graphic.
I doubt many of you will see this, but if you do, I want you to know I'm very greatful of your helpful hints, tips, and advice, and I'm extremly happy to be welcomed into such a positive community.
Hi Josh,
I agree with others that 4x5 is the place to start.
There is so much to learn in the LF world that you're going to take lots of photos.
LF is nothing like any other format you've used, regardless of size.
The 4x5 option is much less expensive, and many more options exist (film, lenses, enlargers).
You can always use what you learn in larger formats (5x7, 8x10) if you decide that's what you want.
I shoot all three. They're different. Each has its own sweet spot.
- Leigh
If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.
Bookmarks