Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: best options for 8x10 scanning

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    628

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    Ralph's right, for a one-off project go with professional drum scans.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    Posts
    249

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    CXC is right .....

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    Posts
    249

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    Actually, forget it - at 4000 dpi your file will be around 2GB. How will they deliver the file to you?

    You'd better buy a drum scanner - I think the cheaper ones that cover that size film and that resolution are around $200,000 (I could be wrong ... they might be more)

  4. #14
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    "Actually, forget it - at 4000 dpi your file will be around 2GB. How will
    they deliver the file to you? "

    easy - DVD
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  5. #15

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    a 2 gig file (actually i hope it will be a bit larger) is nothing. i will have them put it on a 40 gig hard drive for me. i will need at least 80 gig i reckon to handle the upsizing that inevitably will occur once i import it into photoshop.

    i assumed once i realized the 4870 was out that i'd have to use a pro drum scanner. boston photo imaging seems good for any NE area types intersted in drum scans of 8x10. very reasonable pricing.

    thanks again!!

    p.s. i bought an agfa on ebay as you suggested for test scans etc.

    thanks!!

  6. #16

    best options for 8x10 scanning

    I scan 10x8 negatives with an Epson 2450. Each sheet requires 3 separate scans which I then stitch together with Photoshop. So long as you lock the exposure for each scan & make sure the film is kept parallel for each stripe it works fine. At full resolution, you'll end up with a file around 1GB in size.

Similar Threads

  1. Microtek i900 suitable for scanning BW 8x10 film?
    By JM Woo in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2005, 22:27
  2. Newton rings when scanning 8x10" plates
    By Carlos A. Schwartz in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2005, 03:32
  3. 240 options for 8x10
    By Robert Skeoch in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 14-Apr-2005, 09:56
  4. 8x10" Film Holder Options
    By David R Munson in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2002, 19:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •