Thanks, Jim, that was nice of you.
My only negative experience with a Yashica TLR was with an inaccurate frame advance. But it's not as though it didn't need a CLA, anyway.
Thanks, Jim, that was nice of you.
My only negative experience with a Yashica TLR was with an inaccurate frame advance. But it's not as though it didn't need a CLA, anyway.
Some how I feel better eating sausage for lunch with a Rollei on the table, while a Yashica just goes better with a California Roll. YMMV, of course!
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White
I say to heck with the idea that "real photographers use film". That's dead. But view camera photographers like to control the plane of the film (or sensor) and the plane of the lens.
Mike → "Junior Liberatory Scientist" ✌
Quote = "I didn't think I could get into LF for just a couple of 100$"
LF is sort of like the "Roach Motel" trap of Photography. For a couple hundred dollars, you can get in, but you can't get out!!!
+1 to this too.
TLR vs sheet film for me is based around output: 120 film is a pain to scan (i.e. I can't afford a decent scanner), but it great for optical enlargements, sheet film can be scanned on a flatbedt or via a DSLR, and still get "good enough" prints in size and quality. For me.
Last edited by Will Frostmill; 5-Jan-2015 at 06:03. Reason: tyop
Bookmarks