The fact is, that exactly three Parks in the West are the cash cows that finance much of the entire system, namely, Yosemite Valley, Jellystone, and the south rim
of the Grand. Therefore they encourage a LOT of tourism to these three destinations, and want all the amenities of what these places represent in peak season.
Yos Valley is in fact a city of up to 30,000 people on a typical summer weekend. Which is why I avoid it. Why wouldn't I, when there are entire chunks of backcounty even within that same Park jurisdiction where one might hike for a week with only 50/50 odds of even seeing another person? I spent two week last
months in the Wind Rivers, where I had a stunning campsite right beside the river on a meadow at big as Tuolumne Mdws, with no one in the entire thing other
than us. Why the hell would I want to drive into Yellowstone stuck behind 500 cars? I did stock briefly at Jackson on the way home, then headed the OPPOSITE
direction. No traffic, fabulous scenery. When I deliberately go to Jellystone, it's on the edge of off-season, just like Zion, or Yos, or GC.... which also seems to
be when things are the most beautiful anyway. But there is this tension in the highly popular parks to compromise between an outdoor experience and something
more akin to a full-featured theme park. As kids we appropriately nicknamed Yosemite as "Curry National Park" for the concessionaire that seemed to dictate
policy there. The Ken Burns NP documentary series on the NP's is really informative for the history behind all this tension. Fortunately, there are still lots of
Parks where solitude is abundant, even close to the road. One of the most heavily visited NP areas in the nation is right across the bridge - Pt Reyes and the
Golden Gate area ... and even there I can find solitude any day of the year. 95% of the people always go to only 5% of the places, no matter which area is in
consideration. But I was annoyed last Saturday on one of the local trails when some jogger trotted past my Norma & Ries not only wearing one of those idiotic
wristbands that allegedly tells you how many calories you are burning, but audibly broadcast it. Never encountered it before. If he's too stupid to know whether
he is getting exercise of not that's his problem. But I don't need to hear from his silly techie toy.
Bookmarks