Page 20 of 23 FirstFirst ... 101819202122 ... LastLast
Results 191 to 200 of 226

Thread: LF Clarification

  1. #191

    Re: LF Clarification

    Including this one pure hypocrisy


    Interesting article: "36 Megapixels vs 6×7 Velvia" and 4 x 5

  2. #192

    Re: LF Clarification

    Actually most scanners have sensors smaller than 4 inches. It is only the lenses that allow them to scan LF Film. For that matter I use the Betterlight to scan LF Film.
    Even Drum scanners have very small openings much smaller than 4 inches.

    And if I didn't say anything you wouldn't have known.

    Oh well

    8 years wasted.

  3. #193

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    295

    Re: LF Clarification

    Quote Originally Posted by Adamphotoman View Post
    Yes make better images.

    I can take solace in that the Betterlight does make better images.

    So do take off ALL posts...
    For me hanging around on forums is mostly inversely proportional to making better images. In that way the new rules helped. The bulk of my images are made with a camera capable of movements and a digital back.

  4. #194

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: LF Clarification

    It wasn't long ago that things were reversed. Those shooting digital were the oddballs and analog shooters were common. Now it's the other way around. I guess I just like being weird.

  5. #195

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,805

    Re: LF Clarification

    Quote Originally Posted by Adamphotoman View Post
    Please remove every post that I have ever made...
    Quote Originally Posted by Adamphotoman View Post
    ...So do take off ALL posts...
    The moderators can't/don't read everything people write here. If you wish to have your posts removed, contact them either by clicking the small black triangle-with-an-exclamation-point at the lower left of either of your posts or the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of the page. Ask them to delete all your posts that way, if that's what you want. I'm not sure why you do, even if you're not planning to participate here any longer.

  6. #196

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Re: LF Clarification

    If you don't want something posted to be permanent don't post...

    If you don't shoot 4x5 or larger but still want to post and want to complain about how unfair the world is, go to APUG.

  7. #197

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: LF Clarification

    Stone, the APUG powers that be won't let him brag about how wonderful scanning backs are. APUG isn't the world but some could easily see it as unfair. Personally, I just follow forums' rules as best I can and don't complain about them.

  8. #198
    Moderator Ralph Barker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Rio Rancho, NM
    Posts
    5,036

    Re: LF Clarification

    From the Guidelines (AKA Terms of Service):

    What about Intellectual Property Rights?
    By submitting materials to this site, you you are representing that are you are the owner, or are authorized by the owner to do so. As a consequence, all the material posted in this site is assumed copyrighted by their respective authors, and shouldn't be reproduced without permission and proper credit by any means, including framing. The site doesn't claim copyright to any material submitted by readers. However, by submitting materials to this site, you grant an irrevocable royalty-free license to the maintainers of this site to publish that material on the largeformatphotography.info site. The maintainers of the site are not obligated to remove posted material, should you request it, but may do so if it does not conform to forum guidelines. No other rights are granted. The site will not use your materials without proper attribution to you, nor will it edit them in a way that would misrepresent your intent.

  9. #199

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Re: LF Clarification

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    Stone, the APUG powers that be won't let him brag about how wonderful scanning backs are. APUG isn't the world but some could easily see it as unfair. Personally, I just follow forums' rules as best I can and don't complain about them.
    Oh! Haha I should have said DPUG then, hah!!

  10. #200
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,511

    Re: LF Clarification

    'From the Guidelines (AKA Terms of Service): ...by submitting materials to this site, you grant an irrevocable royalty-free license to the maintainers of this site to publish that material on the largeformatphotography.info site.'

    +1

    Don't just write here, read also.

    I will try to remember that...

    Tin Can

Similar Threads

  1. Some Process Clarification, Please
    By William Whitaker in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2013, 12:42
  2. zs clarification
    By coops in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4-May-2011, 17:44
  3. Kodak T Max 400 LF/ULF Clarification
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2005, 08:13
  4. Clarification about Pyro
    By steve simmons in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 17-Jun-2004, 20:07
  5. Go to 4x5 or Stay with 6x6 - I need some clarification
    By Hugh Sakols in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 1-Nov-2003, 09:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •