Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Dip n' dunk 4x5

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    359

    Dip n' dunk 4x5

    Currently I'm using Mod 54 to develop my 4x5 B/W, C41 and E6. And trays to develop my 5x7 and 8x10 B/W. I'd like to standardize on tanks and racks for all 3 formats. I used them before but came across some surge marks that I'd rather not revisit if possible.

    Does anybody know a good hanger to eliminate the surge marks?
    Signature deleted as to not offend certain people

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,851

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    The kodak hangers work fine. It's your agitation technique which is the problem. Very little movement is required to put fresh developer in contact with the film.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    359

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    LAst time I used dip and dunk it was whit 5x7 and I had some surge marks on my film. I thought I went slow enough, but maybe I should lift and dunk it a little slower?
    Signature deleted as to not offend certain people

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    232

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    I use the Kodak hangers for 8x10 and 4-up 4x5. I have not had uneven development problems, I subscribe to Vinny's theory, "Very little movement is required to put fresh developer in contact with the film." I rock the tank moderately for agitation, works for me.

  5. #5
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    Go faster, not slower. The marks (AKA "bromide drag") are caused by exhausted developer remaining in contact with the emulsion for too long and producing a localized restraining effect.

    When I agitate, I pull the hangers completely out of the solution and tilt to one side to drain, and put them back in in the tank. Next cycle I do the same, tilting to the opposite side, and so on, just like Adams recommends in The Negative, and I haven't had any problems with surge marks.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    397

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    I agitate in a similar manner as David with no surge marks. In my processing I agitate once every minute and this takes about 7 to 10 seconds to complete.
    Ron McElroy
    Memphis

  7. #7
    hacker extraordinaire
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,331

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    I used to use kodak hangers and never found the magic agitation technique that always gave even development. I went back to tray processing.
    Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do.
    --A=B by Petkovšek et. al.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    North of Chicago
    Posts
    1,758

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    I found hangers to be developer dependent. Replenished XTOL worked fine, but they did not get on with Pyrocat. Since I really want to use Pyrocat I now use a Slosher.
    ____________________________________________

    Richard Wasserman

    https://www.rwasserman.com/

  9. #9
    bob carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario,
    Posts
    4,946

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    Plus one
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    Go faster, not slower. The marks (AKA "bromide drag") are caused by exhausted developer remaining in contact with the emulsion for too long and producing a localized restraining effect.

    When I agitate, I pull the hangers completely out of the solution and tilt to one side to drain, and put them back in in the tank. Next cycle I do the same, tilting to the opposite side, and so on, just like Adams recommends in The Negative, and I haven't had any problems with surge marks.

  10. #10
    Vanannan
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Isle Of Man
    Posts
    524

    Re: Dip n' dunk 4x5

    I use nitrogen burst agitation for sheet film, perfectly even negs every time

Similar Threads

  1. Dip and Dunk vs Inversion
    By David de Gruyl in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2-May-2010, 14:03
  2. Dip & Dunk T-Max?
    By Phil Hudson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2008, 07:25
  3. D-76 1+1, dip-n-dunk with tmy,tmx
    By Chuck P. in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Aug-2007, 05:45
  4. Dip 'n' Dunk
    By steve_geo in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-Mar-2007, 21:28

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •