First portrait on 8x10
Dan, with landscape and former fracking site, central Pennsylvania
8x10 Portra 400 / Fujinon 300A
Well, this really applies to soft-focus lenses like the Imagon, although there may be poorly corrected lenses (Petzval, maybe?) that would benefit from the same technique. My experience is with the Imagon, Verito, Hyperion, Kodak Portrait and Heliar; in every case, the softness increases as one moves away from the lens axis.
The idea is that a typical head shot has the eyes about a third of the way down from the top. If the lens is centered on the film, the sharpest area will be somewhere below the eyes. In vorgonyi's picture, the nose is sharper than the eyes, at least on my monitor. He may well have focused on the eyes, but the depth of field was enough that the nose, on the lens axis, is sharper than the eyes will ever be (because they are farther from the lens axis).
So: center the lens on the film, position the entire camera to center the eyes in the picture, and focus on the catchlights. Now, using front movements only, shift the image on the film until the composition looks right, and make the exposure. This leaves the eyes as the sharpest features in the picture, which is what one usually wants.
Does this help?
Harold
Perfect thank you.
End of Season... by Scott --, on Flickr
14" no-name f/6 Petzval, Eastman #2 8x10, Ektascan BR/A in HC-110 dil H (6:00 at 20C).
From March, but it took me way too long to develop + scan + dust + process these negatives.
Untitled by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
Untitled by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
Killer photo, Scott.
Isaac, the second photo is fantastic.
Bookmarks