So,
I'm back with this dilemma again. I currently have a 4x5 field camera and a super cheap monorail with 90,135, 150, 180mm lenses. I also have a Cambo/Calumet C1 in really nice condition.
A short while back, due to being 'between jobs', I sold my 300mm lens and 5 8x10 filmholders.
I am trying to decide to decide whether it's worth keeping the 8x10, with a view to gradually getting back into the format. I've sat down with a notepad and made out a pro's/cons list but I can't decide.
I shoot a mix of film/moving image work (no clients for this yet, but plenty featured work) portraits (digital, 6x6, 6x7, 4x5 & very occasionally 8x10)
I have a few projects in mind that I feel the 8x10 would be perfect for, I have used fairly recently for this project www.soundportraits.net
But, I keep going to-and-fro between wanting to just concentrate on 4x5 where the cost is substantially lower and there is still a visual 'signature', or using both formats, but using the 8x10 more selectively.
I'm still 'between jobs' as my teaching contract was terminated last Summer due to cutbacks & commissions are thin on the ground.
8x10 film costs €115 for 50 sheets Fomapan, that's about $164
I know I probably have too much lens coverage in 4x5; 135 and 150 are very close after all, as is 180. and I'm left with the short-term problem of re-acquiring holders and a 300mm lens.
Words of wisdom appreciated....
I have a mini-project set up for my hometown using 4x5 or 8x10 during an arts festival and a few other short-term projects in mind, and have been trying to convince myself that maybe I could crowd-fund these projects.
Thanks, D
Bookmarks