i don't mean to come off as snooty, but what would my options be if i were to spend a little more $$. i'd be willing to put more money towards the lens if there was an appreciable difference in quality. are these <$50 lenses being mentioned because that's all that's available, or because there's no reason to spend any more, as the gains in sharpness is not enough to offset the difference in price?
if there were some options in the $200 - $300 range that were significantly better than those mentioned, i'd certainly consider them as well. again, i'm just attempting to ascertain all of my options before making a decision.
thanks, fellas,
Bookmarks