Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

  1. #1

    Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    I'm an 8x10 WP shooter but due to budget issues I only have a B&J rig. It's a great camera but mobility is an issue as it's not a true field camera.

    I'm thinking of downgrading to 4x5 for field work but am concerned about putting collodion through a clean wista.

    Would you? Or would you try and find a beater 4x5 field and not worry about collodion and silver nitrate damaging wood.

    Thanks everyone

  2. #2
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Hmm I've done a little wet plate and never got any of the chemistry anywhere near the camera itself-inside of the film holder yes.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  3. #3

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Unfortunately I'm a slob... My GG on the 8x10 is a mess. I need to clean it!

  4. #4
    Andrew Moxom
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    308

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    if you are clean, you should get minimal silver stains. It all depends on how well you clean the plate holder and make sure your gloved hands are clean before touching the camera. Over time though, some stains are inevitable unless you make a dedicated back and plate holder, as the sacrificial wood.

    I use both a 4x5 chamonix and 8x10 chamonix. I made a hinging ground glass gate and a slide in plate holder for the 4x5 and it has taken all the stains with no issues on the main body parts. When I want to shoot film, I just remove the wet plate attachment and I am good to go. With the chamonix 8x10, it has a few small black silver stain spots on the glass that is it. I use chamonix and jodyake plate holders and make sure they are clean prior to inserting into the camera. Eventually, you will get some stains.... Badges of honor so to speak.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    4,431

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    I'd use your existing camera. I use all mine for wetplate, and no stains. If you get stains you don't like one day, you could buy another clean back to put on the camera.

  6. #6
    Drew Bedo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    3,225

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Getting a 4x5 might not be what you really want to do. 4x5 contact prints are . . .small. I assume that your current B&J is a monorail?


    Maybe a workable atrategy would be to replace monorail camera with an 8x10 field camera; something that packs-up more compactly. The Kodak 2D cameras and B&J wooden folders can be found at reasonable prices. This way, you would still have those large-enough-to-look-at contact prints

    If you win the lottery, the folks at Star might be the way to go. http://starcameracompany.com/cameras.html
    Drew Bedo
    www.quietlightphoto.com
    http://www.artsyhome.com/author/drew-bedo




    There are only three types of mounting flanges; too big, too small and wrong thread!

  7. #7

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Drew, it isn't a monorail but also isn't a true field. It folds up but doesn't fold flat. Therefore it's 100% impossible to toss in a bag.

    It's a great camera and does exactly what I want but it's just not portable when hiking away from the car.

  8. #8
    Drew Bedo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    3,225

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Understood: Not a monorail.

    I can only speak from my own experience. I have had a B&J wooden bed type camera (5x7) and currently have a 8x10 "2D". Both models collapse tight to the rear standard and the bed folds up to protect either the mounted lens or the GG.I really miss not being able to keep the lens mounted. While neither model will fold as compactly as my Zone VI, I have put both into backpacks for day hiking.

    The 2D is as pretty (in its own way) as a Zone VI but front movement is limited to rise/fall.. The B&J cameras are painted grey and look a little clunky ("big-boned"), but are strong and have any movement you could want. I wouldn't worry about staining one.
    Drew Bedo
    www.quietlightphoto.com
    http://www.artsyhome.com/author/drew-bedo




    There are only three types of mounting flanges; too big, too small and wrong thread!

  9. #9

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Bedo View Post
    Understood: Not a monorail.

    I can only speak from my own experience. I have had a B&J wooden bed type camera (5x7) and currently have a 8x10 "2D". Both models collapse tight to the rear standard and the bed folds up to protect either the mounted lens or the GG.I really miss not being able to keep the lens mounted. While neither model will fold as compactly as my Zone VI, I have put both into backpacks for day hiking.

    The 2D is as pretty (in its own way) as a Zone VI but has limited front movement is limited to rise/fall.. The B&J cameras are painted grey and look a little clunky ("big-boned"), but are strong and have any movement you could want. I wouldn't worry about staining one.
    I'll have to see if I am doing something wrong, I can't get it that tight... Perhaps I'll just go ahead and use the Wista for wet plate for the smaller format.

  10. #10
    Drew Bedo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    3,225

    Re: Wetplate Dedicated or Use Existing 4x5

    You probably ARE doing it right. Those cameras DO NOT fold into a book-like package. They ARE mnore bulky than a modern folding field camera. I suggested that rout because thay are an affordable way to get an 8x10 camera that you might not mind getting slightly stained.

    My Zone VI is the smaller model made for Zone VI Studios by Wista in the 1980s. It is pettily built with only 12 inches of extension, and folds up into a tight self-contained package. This is important to me now as it is also pretty light weight . . .and I need a new hip. If a light weight and compact package is important to you too, then use the little Wista.

    I am hoping that the Wanderlust TravelWide project moves forward into full production. wWile giving up all movements, they will be compact and ultra-light weight. With the lens removed, I think one would go into a dish washer! Stain-Free Forever!
    Drew Bedo
    www.quietlightphoto.com
    http://www.artsyhome.com/author/drew-bedo




    There are only three types of mounting flanges; too big, too small and wrong thread!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 3-Jan-2014, 14:43
  2. Your best efforts at making your own example of an existing photo
    By Kevin J. Kolosky in forum Image Sharing (LF) & Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14-Jan-2013, 13:27
  3. existing daylight processing equpiment
    By johnielvis in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 21-Jan-2012, 10:50

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •