Although a common assumption, I am not convinced that all artists understand their own work --- a good time to dispense with the statement.
Although a common assumption, I am not convinced that all artists understand their own work --- a good time to dispense with the statement.
Why is it OK to engage in Pantheism here on the forum, but taboo to speak equally about belief systems that worship a 'Creator'? This seems a double standard to me. Hypocrites.
You can discuss creator-based belief systems here but sensible guidelines apply.
See my post #4.
My belief system, as I describe there, implies a creator, allows for miracles, "makes me feel in touch with the universe," and proves an effective antidote to Mumbo Jumbo. ;^)
Hey, Mr. Galli!
I reread all the posts and can't really find any pantheism in them. I guess I don't quite understand the "hypocrite" allegation, and have not found any such taboo. I would suspect that Jesus loved trees. The Buddha sat underneath one for quite a while. Odin hung from one by the wrists for three days (sound familiar?) in order to gain wisdom.
If you REALLY want to get cranked, go to www.quantumburp.wordpress.com and read 2 pieces: "The Center of the Universe," and "The Cosmic Dialectic, or, Jesus Wouldn't Tweet." In that order, preferably. And remember, stars died so that you could live..
Bruce Barlow
author of "Finely Focused" and "Exercises in Photographic Composition"
www.brucewbarlow.com
Bookmarks