I have been wanting to develop 8x10 X-Ray film but I have never had the correct equipment for development.
My makeshift darkroom does not have plumbing so try development was not appropriate and all other rooms in the house have large windows and glass doors. I perform most of my development with a Jobo Rotary system - this works great, but it is inappropriate for X-ray film - the back side gets scratched and the internal tank ridges leave marks on the film. I had tried many variations to the Jobo and eventually decided X-Ray film would not be practical.
Last week I bought a Paterson Orbital Processor and have been testing/modifying it - I thought my experience my be interesting to some...
My first image developed was a portrait shot on 8x10 Fuji HTR X-ray Film.
Based on reading, I put two small balls of BluTac on 2 diagonal corners of the film before loading the film in the Orbital Processor to help flow under the film. I developed with 200ml paRodinal 1:50 for 4 minutes using continuous manual rotations of the tank on the tanks domed base.
Certainly not elegant, but it worked!
Next I tried some still life images, developed in the same way. The first image I developed with 200m of chemicals and I noticed strong bands of uneven development.
Orbital Processor Test - Uneven Development #1
Some posters on the internet used more developer, so I developed a second picture with 300ml of chemicals.
Orbital Processor - Uneven Development #2
Even stronger banding.
The bands were aligned on the outer edges of the pictures, Other posts on the internet suggested the internal fins (inside the tank) were the cause of the uneven development. This seemed vary plausible - the banding reminded me of flow marks you can get on 35mm film near the sprocket holes if you agitate the film too aggressively.
Why didn't the first portrait have banding then? I suspect it does, but it just so happens the dark background completely masks the banding.
I decided to make some modifications to the tank...
Bookmarks