There's another thread about what has been lost as digital tools become more mainstream in photography.
I thought it would be interesting to consider a perspective that gets ignored most of the time: in what ways have people using analog materials been liberated, or encouraged to work in new and interesting ways?
There's such an obvious parallel with the early days of photography, when the new medium started disenfranchising painters and illustrators whose trade was realistic depiction.
People were quick to announce the death of painting, but the only thing that died (or downsized) was mimetic painting. Photography turned out to be one of the forces spurring painters into the world of abstraction and expressionism—tasks it was better suited for than the new medium, whose ties to the physical world were both a strength and a limitation.
My friend Anne McDonald provides one example. She's moved from traditional photography to wild an unpredictable mural making technique, that employs elements of photogram, light painting, and selective development, bleaching, and toning. She works with out-of-date mural paper and with chemicals from the darkroom, the kitchen, and the medicine cabinet. Her method requires a kind of improvised dialog with the materials that is entirely dependent on their chemical nature.
In the 1990s there was an artist in the Denver Salon who made murals by covering his body in developer and lying on exposed mural paper (hey kids: not recommended).
Does anyone know of other examples? What can you do with analog tools/ materials that's fundamental different from what you can do with digital ones? What discoveries have been made in the last 15 years?
Bookmarks