Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 5x7 versus 8x10

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    46

    5x7 versus 8x10

    If you were going to experiment with X-ray film and light sensitive paper, which format would you go with? 5x7 or 8x10? For example, based on availability of these types of film for the two formats short-term and a bit longer term... Hope this question doesn't sound too esoteric! Thanks.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    The cost is so low, i intend to do my experimenting with 8x10.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    You don't have to cut down 8x10, so I went with 8x10.
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    133

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    I would definitely go with 8x10 in order to avoid having to cut the film down. Apparently x-ray film scratches really easily - best to avoid any extra handling steps.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    46

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    Great to know. Thanks all. If anyone else has thoughts in this space, keep them coming.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    118

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    I went with 5X7 just because I happen to already have the camera and holders on hand. I do have an 8 X 10 but is very inconvient to haul when hiking any distance.
    Having to cut film wasn't a concern

  7. #7
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,518

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    I am cutting down 7X17 to use in 3 cameras. 2x3, 5X7 and 7X11. So far so good, but it does scratch way easier than my favorite EFKE. Too bad about them.

    As soon as I can, I will buy 8X10, not cutting will be nice.

    And right now, I am mostly experimenting with 2X3, cheaper than cheap. I think my water costs more, and I get free water...


    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Stowell View Post
    I went with 5X7 just because I happen to already have the camera and holders on hand. I do have an 8 X 10 but is very inconvient to haul when hiking any distance.
    Having to cut film wasn't a concern
    Tin Can

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    Quote Originally Posted by Takizawa View Post
    If you were going to experiment with X-ray film and light sensitive paper, which format would you go with? 5x7 or 8x10? For example, based on availability of these types of film for the two formats short-term and a bit longer term... Hope this question doesn't sound too esoteric! Thanks.
    8x10, without question.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bath, Ohio 44210 USA
    Posts
    565

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    Is cost of film your reason for using X-ray film? If you have to buy a camera and lens or lenses in one size or the other, I would think the higher cost of an 8x10 camera of identical quality and lenses, maybe even an enlarger vs. 5x7 would far outweigh any savings in film. Pick the size that more closely addresses all of your needs.

    For full disclosure, I shoot 8x10 and 7x17. I enlarge 8x10 negatives and contact print 7x17. I have never used 5x7. I have not stayed in a Holliday Inn Express since I retired from sales ten years ago, so what do I know?

    John

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    46

    Re: 5x7 versus 8x10

    Cost is not the reason for x-ray film. I simply want to experiment. The good news is I have a new camera coming. It is the venerable Kodak 2D 8x10!

    Michael

Similar Threads

  1. 11x14 versus 8x10
    By LFdilettante in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 2-Apr-2013, 05:43
  2. 4x5 versus 8x10 portriats
    By scathontiphat in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 20-Mar-2012, 10:29
  3. 9x12 12x15 18x24 versus 4x5 5x7 8x10 - for Linhofs and others
    By Frank Petronio in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2011, 15:03
  4. Fuji NEOPAN 100 ACROS versus Ilford DELTA 100 and FP4+ in 8x10
    By DolphinDan in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2009, 11:18
  5. Fuji A 240/9 versus Caltar II N 240/5,6 for 8X10.
    By Ramon Torres in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7-May-2001, 21:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •