Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

  1. #1
    Brandon Draper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    49

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    Does anyone have any thoughts about pre-rinsing b&w films in a Jobo processor? I have always pre-rinsed my roll film with good results. Now that I am learning the zone system & testing film in the 4x5 format. I was wondering if any one had done complete testing on this procedure. I did a quick test. With and without. And didn't see any noticable difference. I am testing HP5+ and Bergger Films.

    I am pre-rinsing for 5 minutes. And dev. with HC-110 Dil-B.

    Thanks!

  2. #2

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    I do it and Jobo recommends it with all developers except Xtol.

    FWIW, I use a CPP and Jobo Expert Drums for both 4x5 and 8x10.

  3. #3
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,532

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    Hi Brandon,

    Ilford does NOT recommend the use of a pre-rinse for their HP-5+ film when using a rotary processor "as it can lead to uneven processing". See the HP5 Plus Fact Sheet at: www.ilford.com/html/us_english/pdf/HP5_Plus.pdf. This statement appears in the paragraph in the upper right corner of page 3.

    From what the Ilford Tech. people have told me, there is a wetting agent incorporated into the emulsion of HP-5+ film, and pre-rinsing will dissolve it out.

  4. #4

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    I've heard the recomendation not to pre rinse ilford films (I've heard it as all ilford films not just HP5+, not sure which is correct), and most of the time do not pre rinse, except with pyrocat (which gets a 5 min. pre rinse per the recomendations for that developer), and have gotten good results both ways using FP4+. I use a jobo cpe-2 with 2500 series tanks. That's been my experience anyway.

    Peter

  5. #5

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    I tested HP-5+ with and without a pre-rinse in the Jobo CPP-2. My developing times were 5-10% shorter without the pre-rinse. I asked Jobo about using a pre-rinse, and they said it did not matter if you use one or not, as long as you adjust your development times and make sure the pre-rinse is 5 minutes long (if you use one). The problem with "uneven processing" that Ilford writes about may happen if the film is given a short pre-soak. Jobo recommends a 5 minute pre-rinse to avoid this problem. I asked Ilford about the Jobo 5 minute pre-rinse, and they said it was okay to do this.

  6. #6

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    <shrug> I shoot HP5+ and FP4+ almost exclusively, I've used D76, PhotoFormulary's improved D76, Ilford DD-X and Pyrocat-HD in the Jobo, all with a 5 minute pre-rinse. Development has been perfectly even in every case.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The "Live Free or Die" state
    Posts
    1,004

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    I use a 3 minute pre-rinse and have had no problems with Ilford, or other films.

  8. #8

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    I always pre-rinse film regardless of make or type. I use the Jobo CPP2 with lift and expert Jobo drums. I am very happy to say that I get consistently very good results. My main mono film is Ilford Delta 100. I use one shot developer. After the two/three minutes pre wash all dye is removed from the backing, which can only be a good thing. Perhaps Ilford should be advised!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    129

    Jobo CPA Pre-Rinse

    >Ilford does NOT recommend the use of a pre-rinse for their HP-5+ film when using a rotary processor "as it can lead to uneven processing". See the HP5 Plus Fact Sheet at: www.ilford.com/html/us_english/pdf/HP5_Plus.pdf. This statement appears in the paragraph in the upper right corner of page 3.

    >From what the Ilford Tech. people have told me, there is a wetting agent incorporated into the emulsion of HP-5+ film, and pre-rinsing will dissolve it out.

    >--Eugene Singer, 2004-05-28 16:30:25

    Yeah Eugene, it says "it CAN" lead to uneven development, not "it does absolutely". I found a pre-rinse gave more consistent results with Ilford films in my rotary. I tested it both ways. And, it depends on what Ilford tech person you talk to--there are ones that will say it is fine. Maybe you have never used a rotary?

Similar Threads

  1. Jobo 3010 without Jobo Machine ?
    By Ken Lee in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2024, 01:02
  2. C-41 in Jobo
    By John H. Henderson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-Feb-2007, 14:34
  3. Can a JOBO 3005 Tank be used on JOBO manual rollers.
    By J. P. Mose in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6-Oct-2004, 08:30
  4. Jobo
    By Don Niemczyk in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14-Oct-2003, 20:00
  5. Jobo
    By Kevin J. Kolosky in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-Apr-2002, 18:13

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •