Katherine: Yes, I've just recently found the categories at the lower section of the page too.
Type: Posts; User: David Roy; Keyword(s):
Katherine: Yes, I've just recently found the categories at the lower section of the page too.
So from the points raised above one would really need a 210mm for some types of subject characteristics and a 300 for others. I suppose cause I'm cheap I could use the 210mm and crop a bit as a ...
Edward: That is good to know. I never thought it matter.
Katharine: I found this link should answer your question http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=000ek3
Well, it looks like I'm looking for a used 210. Thank you.
Yes, shoulders, actually they are full height portraits. I like the 50mm 35mm film because of the normal perspective. It doesn't appear to distort someone out of figure.
I use a 50mm lens for portraits on 35mm. For large format 4x5, if I bought an i nexpensive used 127 (135?)mm Kodak Ektar can I achieve the same perspective by p ulling the bellows more forward than...
Todd: Thanks, your right, I did mean quickload.
Do I still need 4x5 Film Holder if I use Fuji Quik-Stick film (e.i. Astia 100)?
Thanks Paul, Pete, Neil, Bruce and David. I'm just being as thrifty as I can and want one lens to do it all :)
I want to get into large format but I do also need an enlarger. So, apparently...
Is it pointless to load a Schneider Componon S. 210mm backwards on a 8 x 10 came ra? I recall this was done in a magazine, but I cannot remember which. It was a few years ago.
How does it compare...