Moving from the Fatali thread.....
Why don't color landscape photographers just own their artistic expression instead of pretending that they are documenting "gods light". Since when does photographing with supersaturated contrasty films and then goosing the color more in a Ciba print qualify as documenting nature?
I was just in Tom Tills gallery in Moab, superb images printed on Ilfochrome with way oversaturated color (so far out of gamut that red flowers were completely blocked) with off register masks etc. More documents of "natures glory"?
When did artistic expression and license become such a liability in color landscape photography? Is photography not an art form?
Bookmarks