Quote Originally Posted by paulbarden View Post
Hey John. Well, I did try this two years ago and all I got for my efforts was a LOT of Pictorico film and ink wasted. I got a couple of somewhat printable negatives (working with salted paper) but none ever came close enough to what was possible with a correctly developed "in camera" negative on FP4. And so, I gave up on digital negs - too expensive, unpredictable, and far too much technical jumping-through-hoops for my liking. (the whole point of making POP prints is to avoid having to include a computer in my workflow!)

@Andrew: I did look up Burkholder's tutorials on making digital negs, but its all behind a (fairly expensive) paywall. Investing another $77 to force me in front of a computer to make suitable negatives isn't the least bit appealing. I'm not at all confident that I will end up with a simple process that will get me a good negative from my Canon printer. But thanks for the suggestion.
Sorry Paul. I didn't realise that.