Originally Posted by
Michael R
TXP 320 has a different exposure-density curve than many other films. It was originally intended primarily for controlled lighting/studio/portrait situations. It has a somewhat longer toe (ie a little less contrast in dark areas) than a film like FP4/HP5, and a somewhat “upswept” curve shape favouring mid tone and highlight contrast, compared with FP4/HP5. It will also easily develop to higher densities compared with FP4/HP5.
A unique feature is the slight “tooth” to the base side of the film, originally intended for retouching. The nice thing about that is it means you’re less likely to have to deal with Newton rings when glass is involved (scanning, glass enlarger carriers, contact printing).
It’s expensive, yes. Kodak sheet films are expensive but they’re still my favourite. I really think they are still the best so I’ll hang on as long as I can. If I shot 8x10 and shot a lot of film, it might be a different story though. Depends on what you can afford I guess.
Bookmarks