Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Erie Pennsylvania, US
    Posts
    15

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Quote Originally Posted by Annie M. View Post
    Kodak says not to put your chemistry in the septic system they have a publication that may be helpful....

    http://www.kodak.com/global/en/servi.../faq5026.shtml
    Unfortunately we're still dealing with this and unfortunately, the link is broken - page not found. I too, am thinking about getting in to Wet Plate processing, and wondering about the waste disposal.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    near Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    121

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Quote Originally Posted by djkloss View Post
    Unfortunately we're still dealing with this and unfortunately, the link is broken - page not found. I too, am thinking about getting in to Wet Plate processing, and wondering about the waste disposal.
    Waste disposal is an issue for me too - I'm in a situation very similar to the OP's: rural; no municipal water or sewer; on a septic system. After reading the labels of developers and fixers, it makes me shudder to consider routing the chemicals into the ground, via septic system or otherwise. I don't know of any reliable data on the persistence of photo-chemicals in soil, never mind on the migratory pathways of those chemicals and their effects on flora and fauna. I certainly would not chance my $15k drain field.

    I've established a process that works well for me, a low volume user on a budget. I use direct-sun exposure to evaporate as much fluid as possible in two galvanized-steel 7-gallon buckets. In winter I tend to accumulate 20-30 gallons of fluid over the capacity of the buckets. I store that excess in 5-gallon plastic jugs. The stored effluent is easily evaporated in the buckets in summer, along with current waste. The remnant sludge goes into a 5 gallon jug or two, which I can dispose of at the county hazardous waste disposal site in October, an annual free event.

    It helps that my property is 5 acres: I can store the chemicals away from the drain field, the well, and the house, and away from any of those on neighboring properties.

    The main drawbacks to this process are in arranging film/paper development sessions to minimize waste production; lugging waste from the darkroom to the evaporation site ~45 yards away; replacing the buckets once a year (they rust); keeping animals out; and the annual 1.5 hour commute to the hazardous waste disposal site. The buckets cost me about $70 per year, and galvanized hardware cloth to keep animals out was a $25 investment for a 2 year supply.

    On a budget like the one the OP mentions, this process could be done up in spades. Disposal at a for-profit hazardous waste company might also be an alternative.

    Good luck!

    cheers
    Tom

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    near Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    121

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Quote Originally Posted by djkloss View Post
    Unfortunately we're still dealing with this and unfortunately, the link is broken - page not found. I too, am thinking about getting in to Wet Plate processing, and wondering about the waste disposal.
    Check the thread https://www.largeformatphotography.i...posal-question
    wherein Graybeard states: "Silver is a potent bacteriacide; When the metal was less costly, silver nitrate was proposed for use in sanitizing public swimming pools. The eyes of newborns are still treated in most states (as required by statute), with silver nitrate to prevent blindness caused by congenital disease (check your own birth certicate, it may well document that you were cared for in this way). I speak from knowledge on this; I'm a chemist who, before retirement, was responsible for product development at a major silver chemicals manufacturer.

    If you dispose of spent fixer down your household drains you will do serious damage to the friendly bacteria in your septic system and probably cause a consequent premature failure of your septic leach field."

  4. #24
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,961

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Every few months I toss one of these in the toilet:

    https://www.homedepot.com/p/Green-Go...17A6/206337694

    About 6 years here with film/paper development in a basement darkroom going to a septic tank. No problems.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  5. #25
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,650

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    My area treats all waste water in swamp ponds

    No fencing

    dont fall in

    we also have open old coal mine tunnels

    and very few wear seat belts

    I stay home
    Tin Can

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    142

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Minimize the toxicity of the chemicals you use and neutralize as many as you can.

    No Pyro use Metol, abscorbic acid, acetic acid, caffenol, etc.

    Use plain fix well diluted witout hardner.

    If carbon printing, use ferric ammonium citrate instead of dichromate, or neutralize dichromate with sodium sulphite before disposal.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    near Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    121

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Sounds like Corran restores, or heads off, whatever damage he might observe, or anticipate, to his septic tank bacterial population with the Green Gobbler. That's not to say that the photo-chemicals have been gobbled up - but the bacterial population in the septic tank has been augmented. This doesn't speak to the leach field, which is the component of a septic system most likely to broadcast pollutants into the environment.

    There are other threads here and in the Photrio forum, among others, where photographers attest to 'no problem' dumping non-industrial photo-chemical loads into septic systems. Okay - I trust all are reporting their observations accurately.

    I don't trust that casual observations are necessarily adequate. The Green Gobbler may mitigated damage to a septic tank bacterial population, which can have some pretty obvious symptoms, but I don't think it's capable of mitigating photo-chemical pollution of the soil in a drain field. And who among photographers is capable of monitoring photo-chemical infiltration in and beyond their drain field?

    It's a tough issue for photographers to adjudicate, I think: a report doesn't exist that I could find, describing a convincing investigation into the migration and filtration of photo-chemicals in soils, via septic systems, and giving useful rules-of-thumb. So many soils! So many chemicals! Never mind variations in water tables, population density, geology.

    Given that difficulty, I'm paying attention to Kodak and other chemical manufacturers (and their proxies) when they say about septic systems: "Don't pour it down the drain!" . The bold print below is my emphasis. The bold blue headings are links to the quoted documents.

    Sprint Systems:

    In general, used darkroom chemicals, except fixer, may be disposed of in a municipal sewer system if one has a home-based darkroom. Used solutions should never be disposed of in a septic system. Septic systems are designed for biological treatment of standard household waste, and do not properly treat chemical wastes associated with photographic processing.


    Sino-Promise XTOL SDS sheet:

    13. Disposal considerations

    Disposal instructions
    Collect and reclaim or dispose in sealed containers at licensed waste disposal site. Dispose of contents/container in accordance with local/regional/national/international regulations.


    Local disposal regulations
    Dispose in accordance with all applicable regulations.

    Hazardous waste code
    The waste code should be assigned in discussion between the user, the producer and the waste
    disposal company.

    Waste from residues / unused products
    Dispose of in accordance with local regulations. Empty containers or liners may retain some
    product residues. This material and its container must be disposed of in a safe manner (see:
    Disposal instructions).

    Contaminated packaging
    Since emptied containers may retain product residue, follow label warnings even after container is emptied. Empty containers should be taken to an approved waste handling site for recycling or
    disposal.

  8. #28

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    I experienced a septic system failure about 15 years ago that I attributed to photo chemicals down the drain and killing the digestive bacteria over a period of years. Even though I dosed the system monthly with bacteria, the residual silver probably acted as a bacteriocide, requiring complete septic system excavation and replacement in the middle of an Alaskan winter. We barely got the job done even with a large excavator.

    Septic systems are not suitable disposable for any significant quantities of photo chemistry even if you are living on large acreage. OTOH, some of our aquifers sporadically have high levels of natural arsenic. A little Metol or thiosulfate is trivial in comparison.

  9. #29
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,425

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Quote Originally Posted by djkloss View Post
    Unfortunately we're still dealing with this and unfortunately, the link is broken - page not found. I too, am thinking about getting in to Wet Plate processing, and wondering about the waste disposal.
    I would look into clean harbors waste removal. they service your region and are an affordable solution.

  10. #30
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,425

    Re: A Darkroom in the Sticks - Rural Environmental Technologies

    Quote Originally Posted by tomwilliams View Post
    Sounds like Corran restores, or heads off, whatever damage he might observe, or anticipate, to his septic tank bacterial population with the Green Gobbler. That's not to say that the photo-chemicals have been gobbled up - but the bacterial population in the septic tank has been augmented. This doesn't speak to the leach field, which is the component of a septic system most likely to broadcast pollutants into the environment.

    Local disposal regulations
    Dispose in accordance with all applicable regulations.

    Hazardous waste code
    The waste code should be assigned in discussion between the user, the producer and the waste
    disposal company.
    I would not dump green gobbler down my drain ... people go great lengths to dump home remedies down the drain (they don't really work ) .. to me at least it wasn't worth the added stress .. between potential ruined septic and well water, corroded pipes and potential fines ... it was kind of a no-brainer ,
    waste hauler is a sure thing and there's paper work so down the road if someone gets wind that someone is a low volume "waste generator" there's waste hauler info saying that it was taken away and the blue lawn is from the gasworks that used to be on the property ...
    Last edited by jnantz; 7-Jul-2023 at 07:13.

Similar Threads

  1. Building a darkroom
    By Don Wallace in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 10-Apr-2010, 07:27

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •