not really picky, but IDK if one makes an argument that digital is one specific type of shaped "grain" and all film is another different, better type, I'd hope the descriptors would be right
none of this stuff really matter to me, large or small format, doesn't matter to me, digital or film or glass negative, D76 or "urinol" developer, doesn't matter to me either, im more interested in other things
... unfortunately a lot of people who use chemical based photography for whatever reasons put all sorts of barriers up for themselves to "other" everyone else, instead of just realizing
it's just photography and it really doesn't matter what shaped grain it is, or if a computer helped develop the image.
That's just me, I'd rather just make things.
you got the quote wrong, asa1000, "it depends on what the meaning of
IS is". not
it . LOL.
Bookmarks