Originally Posted by
Sal Santamaura
Of course not. What can you post other than further arm-waving irrelevancies?
I scan and pass by most of the things you post, Drew. My responses to a select few of them are submitted for the sole purpose of correcting erroneous information that new readers might be mislead into believing as a result of your know-everything-about-everything attitude and 15,000+ loquaciousness.
A perfect example of irrelevant arm-waving.
The OP has a medium format mixing box. No amount of corner and edge burning-in will accomplish anything with a 4x5 negative.
Of course, that's the whole point. Why do you persist waving your arms about building things, longer lenses and edge burning when the OP has a commercially produced enlarger with one incorrect part that simply needs replacing with the correct one?
Gadfly? Pot, meet kettle.
Bookmarks