Yes. He admitted he was biased against DSLR scanning. And admitted it worked far better than he expected. He also admitted his technique wasn't that great and could be improved.
But even people who know what they're doing, and do it on a regular basis find it fiddly, and difficult.
If you can point out another video or article where someone has done a comprehensive comparison between the technologies, I'd like to see it.
I don't know which comments were yours, but most of the comments I saw that he responded to, he was incredibly tolerant, and open-minded, even to criticism. Then again, there's a level of hostility against the Epson around here that I find a bit baffling, especially since most of the alternatives cost significantly more money, and/or take exponentially greater amounts of effort to accomplish.
Of course, it's also obvious that there is a strong Sony bias here, so ergonomics and ease of use apparently aren't a priority.
Bookmarks