Hello all. I'm finally getting around to finishing the updating of a large older view camera that I purchased many years ago (see pic below, I just have the camera without bellows, back or base). Before I purchase a new bellows and build a back for it, I was wondering if I could get some practical insight from those of you with greater experience in what I would like to achieve.
I intend to use the camera for alternative processes, mostly ambrotypes. Mostly portraits (head and shoulders / 3/4 body) and some still life. The back will accommodate a maximum exposure size of 15" x 15", but will have reducing inserts for lesser sizes (e.g., 8x10 / whole plate). Lenses will likely be a period 19" that I believe covers the 15", as well as mid-century design 15" and 12" lenses for smaller formats. Lighting will be by large strobe (3200 w/s key, with lesser support lighting).
Assuming that the camera is provided a stable base (which I'm working on), it seems to rack out without terrible strain to a max bellows of about 52". It can go further, but I fear the stress of doing so and also hope there would be no need to do so. I was intending to purchase a bellows with that 52" length.
I've gone through a whole series of bellows length / focal length / subject distance / DoF calculations to estimate how this will all work in practice, but I'm hoping for some further insight from those well-versed in a similar experience.
My specific questions would be:
1. Is purchasing a 52" bellows adequate / sensible?
2. What kind of subject working distances, bellows extension and portrait types (e.g. head/ head/shoulder / 1/2 body) would you typically be utilizing in this large of a format, particularly if you were utilizing the full 15" square format and a 19" lens for example? I know that DoF is a great challenge in this context, but just trying to zero in on some practical clarity.
I appreciate any input you can provide. Apologies if any of my questions seem rehashed. I have done the calculations, as well as a good amount of forum post reviewing, and believe I'm in the right ballpark in my thinking, but some corroboration or correction is always helpful. Thank you.
Best regards,
Leo
Bookmarks