I picked this up from John Sexton's newsletter and post the link below. The new 3-D scanners will reportedly do in your unprocessed film instantly.
https://petapixel.com/2019/10/21/bew...r-camera-film/
I picked this up from John Sexton's newsletter and post the link below. The new 3-D scanners will reportedly do in your unprocessed film instantly.
https://petapixel.com/2019/10/21/bew...r-camera-film/
Last edited by Ulophot; 24-Nov-2019 at 11:37. Reason: typo
Philip Ulanowsky
Sine scientia ars nihil est. (Without science/knowledge, art is nothing.)
www.imagesinsilver.art
https://www.flickr.com/photos/156933346@N07/
Unprocessed film...
Tin Can
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/andy8x10
Flickr Site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/62974341@N02/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/andrew.oneill.artist/
...and film that has been shot but not processed...
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/andy8x10
Flickr Site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/62974341@N02/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/andrew.oneill.artist/
Yes, both fresh and exposed but not processed film will be ruined
My point was, OP changed the Headline from "Beware: New 3D Airport Scanners Will Wipe Unprocessed Camera Film"
We should quote source exactly as not doing that is causing a lot of political damage in this PC era.
Tin Can
Any personal reports of bad effects yet?
Just went through Boston and Seattle and did not see any of these machines at the terminals I used.
Maybe hospitals can get these someday as hand-me-downs and not spend small fortunes to look at people's innards in 3d.
This TSA link lists where these scanners are in operation now:
https://www.tsa.gov/computed-tomogra...X-XzRaHn8LG_7Q
Keith Pitman
Another nudge to digital?
Peter Collins
On the intent of the First Amendment: The press was to serve the governed, not the governors --Opinion, Hugo Black, Judge, Supreme Court, 1971 re the "Pentagon Papers."
Bookmarks