I'd like to learn what technical differences have Delta 100 vs TMX for LF.
http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/...1938422338.pdf
http://imaging.kodakalaris.com/sites...6_TMax_100.pdf
spectral response
TMX to me has a more orthopanchromatic look, while Delta looks more panchro to me.
These are the curves, Kodak one is more scientific...
I don't know if ergs vs spectrogram are a bit different information.
To me there it looks that TMX has practical relative lower red sensitivity...
Attachment 162717
Do you think Delta 100 vs TMX spectral look can be mostly matched with blue or yellow filters ???
density curves
Kodak datasheet is much better, showing density build up until 3.0D.
Ilford datasheet only shows practical use range, this is until 2.0D
Is there a real difference?
sharpness
Do Delta 100 match TMX resolving power ?
Can this be detected given resolving power of LF lenses ?
Can it be detected in prints or scans
reciprocity failure
This is clear, TMX has less. It's the single real technical performance difference I found for LF?
grain
I figure it has no importance for LF, as both tabular. perhaps there is an slight difference in small formats...
Bookmarks