View Poll Results: Desired Focal Length!

Voters
329. You may not vote on this poll
  • 65mm

    98 29.79%
  • 90mm

    231 70.21%
Page 91 of 299 FirstFirst ... 41818990919293101141191 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 910 of 2986

Thread: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

  1. #901
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Quote Originally Posted by AuditorOne View Post
    A cheap (err, inexpensive) 28mm viewfinder. An inexpensive rangefinder lying around from some other experimenting that should work perfectly. A couple grafmatics, some ball bungees, lots of Efke 25, a Schneider Angulon 90 in a Linhoff Synchro-Compur with X flash, a couple Vivitar 285HV flashes and some radio triggers.

    All of this right around Christmas! Man oh man, this is gonna be fun!
    Why would you use Efke 25 in this case? If you are ALWAYS shooting with that flash, maybe it makes sense. But if I ever plan to shoot outdoors without flash, I at least want to stop down my Angulon to f/16 at least (maybe f/11 in a pinch if the corners aren't important) and I'll need faster film that if I'm going to hand hold it in anything less than bright sun.

  2. #902

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Wondervu, Colorado
    Posts
    1,328

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Rick,
    You make an excellent point, and it's one that I've been troubled by with this product: the idea that cropping 4x5 is akin to "zooming in." Sure, but then you've just converted your "large format" 4x5 to a "medium format" 3x4 inch or 6x7/6x9cm. If that's how the camera is intended to be used, then that ought to be clearly understood by everyone--especially given the rules of this site which limit displays of images less than 4x5.

    Press photographers could easily crop their images because the print size was so small. One of things I value about large format photography is the ability to print "large" with amazing detail.

  3. #903
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    23,103

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Holy cow, I guess I did not read the rules.

    Images less than 4X5 not permitted, which explains 'safe haven for small format and Polaroid threads.

    Never occured to me shooting 2X3 sheets in holders is too small for here.

    Where do I go?

    Corran warned me this is a huge problem here.

    I won't start, except to say 'scanners'!

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Roberts View Post
    Rick,
    You make an excellent point, and it's one that I've been troubled by with this product: the idea that cropping 4x5 is akin to "zooming in." Sure, but then you've just converted your "large format" 4x5 to a "medium format" 3x4 inch or 6x7/6x9cm. If that's how the camera is intended to be used, then that ought to be clearly understood by everyone--especially given the rules of this site which limit displays of images less than 4x5.

    Press photographers could easily crop their images because the print size was so small. One of things I value about large format photography is the ability to print "large" with amazing detail.
    Tin Can

  4. #904
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    But carrying a medium format camera doesn't give you the wide angle option without another lens or zoom and then you are into far more weight and bulk. This will be light, easy to carry, cheap and versatile using this method.

    I've never seen anything on this site indicating that cropped images are not allowed, just that they need to be made on film of at least 4x5. Most of mine are at least slightly cropped but then the same is true of my medium format and even 35mm images too.

  5. #905
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    9,160

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Don't be so quick to say things "aren't allowed" Michael.

    I believe the definition of what is/isn't LF was defined by the mods as taken by a camera that allowed movements and/or sheet film. Or something to that effect. 6x12 and 6x17 images with roll-film holders on a 4x5 or 5x7 camera is most certainly allowed and common.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  6. #906

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Elko, Nevada
    Posts
    511

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post
    Why would you use Efke 25 in this case? If you are ALWAYS shooting with that flash, maybe it makes sense. But if I ever plan to shoot outdoors without flash, I at least want to stop down my Angulon to f/16 at least (maybe f/11 in a pinch if the corners aren't important) and I'll need faster film that if I'm going to hand hold it in anything less than bright sun.
    Oh, I use Arista EDU 100 and FP4+ as well. I may even go looking for some Kodak 100 TMX. I rarely use ISO 320 or 400. But I love the tonality of Efke 25 and a little fill flash can really show that off in the right circumstances. Even with ISO 100 or 125 film I find a bit of fill flash makes for a very nice photo.

    Besides, a Christmas project using fill flash in a light, point and shoot 4x5 camera just sounds like a lot of fun. And, who knows, I may find I really like the results.
    The Viewfinder is the Soul of the Camera

    If you don't believe it, look into an 8x10 viewfinder!

    Dan

  7. #907

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Wondervu, Colorado
    Posts
    1,328

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Bryan,
    I did not say images less than 4x5 "aren't allowed;" I said "given the rules of this site which limit displays of images less than 4x5."

    So, specifically, the Usage Guidelines state:

    "For the purposes of this forum, we define "large format" as being essentially 4x5, or larger, sheet film. We do, however, allow what would otherwise be considered "medium format" sizes, IF exposed in a view camera (e.g. with a roll-film adapter), technical, or old-style press camera (e.g. the various Graphic cameras). "

    So, images of less than 4x5 that are NOT exposed in a view camera of 4x5 or larger with a roll-film adapter, or a technical 4x5 view camera, or an old-style press camera would not meet the definition. I would say the Travelwide is not any of these, and that images from a Travelwide that are cropped to 6x7 or 6x9 would not meet the definition. But I will let Rick or one of the other moderators decide this. I don't make the rules, I just know they exist. Hell, you could crop a 4x5 to 35mm size; then what would be the point of this being a LF site at all?

    Ben, if you see this, I give up. I tried making a constructive suggestion about expanding the range of your camera. I now regret doing that. At the very least, you know you already have several very loyal supporters for the Travelwide. Best of luck with your production and distribution.

  8. #908
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Oh nonsense. It uses 4x5 sheet film in holders. The negative size is 4x5. No one is going to care if it's cropped. That's just picking nits to be a spoil sport. It doesn't say images less than 4x5, it says FILM. No one cares if you don't use all the film area. Do you always print full frame? I certainly don't. The world doesn't always fit in the proportions of my negative, or image size of my lens for that matter.

  9. #909
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    23,103

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Silly me, so 2X3 Press cameras shooting sheets are not allowed, according to how I read those rules above.

    Specious.
    Tin Can

  10. #910

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Wondervu, Colorado
    Posts
    1,328

    Re: Wanderlust 4x5 P&S

    Randy, the way I read the rule, if it is shot in an old-style press camera, it is allowed even if it "would otherwise be considered 'medium format.'" But, again, this is for the moderators to decide.

Similar Threads

  1. 8x10 or 4x5: Can't decide on a camera for both formats
    By Daniel Stone in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2010, 16:19
  2. Stitching Question - Digital SLR vs 4x5
    By AlaBill in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 9-Mar-2007, 22:30

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •