Very nice, Ken!
Another print of mine, I'm still undecided whether i actually like it or not
Tulips, study I. by andreios, on Flickr
Very nice, Ken!
Another print of mine, I'm still undecided whether i actually like it or not
Tulips, study I. by andreios, on Flickr
Take one. This one's a bit underexposed, unfortunately. The film has lost more speed from age than I anticipated.
Kodak 2D 8X10, 240mm Hugo Meyer Doppel Anastigmat, Tri-X (expired 1976).
Jonathan
Take two.
Pacemaker Speed Graphic, 178mm f/2.5 Aero-Ektar, Polaroid Type 79 (exp. 1994) with a reagent pod from 690 pack film.
Jonathan
Thanks, Ken. This is a case where scanning (except for the dreaded Newton rings!) saved the day. The negative, due to underexposure, is pretty thin and would likely be tough to print by conventional means, but scanners seem to love thin negs and boosting contrast without degrading the image is an easier task than reducing it, at least for me.
Jonathan
Here is taken with Fujinon SF 250
What are they called in English? by dr_aibolit, on Flickr
Bookmarks