Reacting rather than thoroughly evaluating possibilities is an excellent way to make unprovable accusations, such as "B&H lied."
First, read post #245 in this thread:
Then read how Henry Posner reacted to it in the first part of post #270:
Finally, consider that B&H might have, since then, further negotiated its agreement(s) with shipping carriers and/or revised its internal procedures/training so that many darkroom chemicals could once again be shipped.
Can anyone prove B&H lied? No. Unless there's evidence, "quoting reasons" merely repeats an unprovable accusation. Not good.
The only posts after #290 are ones that levy accusations. Ignoring posts that preceed it renders reasonable consideration of possibilities impossible.
No one has to "agree to disagree." Disagreement is a fact whether involved parties accept it or not.
After serving on a number of criminal trial juries, as well as observing participant behavior on several Internet forums over the years, I'm very glad that I don't even present the appearance of engaging in anything illegal. The willingness to "convict" without credible evidence is really scary.
What irked me today was that Ethol LPD in liquid form is shipped (for free) but the power form is pick up only. Had to order from their NY competitor which also got the rest of my order for Film, Papers, and some other accessories.
Bookmarks