Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 50

Thread: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

  1. #31

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,680

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    Once upon a time (years ago), I was told by an Ilford Tech that the film has wetting agents making pre-soaking unnecessary. Sometimes I do; sometimes I don't.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    Before I moved to sheet film, I had problems with uneven development in continuous tone areas of 120 film. I read an article that recommended a presoak to solve that problem; and it did. When I moved up to LF format and sheet film, I read Ansel Adams discussion on how he developed sheet film and he used a presoak with sheet film. I have never developed my sheet film without using a presoak , TRI-X and FP4+ in HC-110, and my continuous tone areas have always been even.

    Regarding the slight purple cast that can remain after processing, hang dry negative in an open window and the UV light will fade away the purple cast.
    Last edited by Paul Hoyt; 5-Feb-2013 at 22:59. Reason: syntax

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Dunedin,Otago,New Zealand
    Posts
    191

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    Well,I think it depends on the film,and also on the developer.
    It is true that Ilford say p/s is un-needed,and that many developers have a surfactant component. So,no pre-soak for me,Unless...Foma,and other European films,if requested for Rodinal stand technique,really benefit from p/s.
    This makes sense to me,because,over the course of an hour or two,diffusion into,and out of the emulsion,reaches a stabilised state.

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    I don't pre-soak HP5+ because Ilford says not to. I figure they know their film better than I do. With TMax 100 and 400 I've done it both ways, never seen a difference, so I stopped pre-soaking. Developer in all cases was D76 1-1. When I was using PMK I pre-soaked because that's what Gordon Hutchings said to do. But after a while I tried not pre-soaking it and saw no difference so I stopped pre-soaking even with PMK.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  5. #35
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    Using an Expert drum 3005 for 8x10's (usually FP4+) it just seems to make sense to me to pre-soak -- which I do for about 5 minutes. If I could see into the drum while it is turning to see how the liquids get moving over the sheets I would know for sure.

  6. #36
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,398

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    The time of the presoak can itself make a minor difference to development, so I always try to keep it
    consistent too.

  7. #37
    Lachlan 717
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,596

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    I do it for two reasons:

    First, it is an inert "trigger" event. It focuses me on the processing I'm about to undertake without the danger of "diving in the deep end" of going straight to the Developer. That few minutes of presoaking is used to double check the chemicals, times, temp etc.

    Second, I just dig the colour of the liquid that comes out of the tank!!
    Lachlan.

    You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -- Wayne Gretzky

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    469

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Hoyt View Post
    Before I moved to sheet film, I had problems with uneven development in continuous tone areas of 120 film. I read an article that recommended a presoak to solve that problem; and it did. When I moved up to LF format and sheet film, I read Ansel Adams discussion on how he developed sheet film and he used a presoak with sheet film. I have never developed my sheet film without using a presoak , TRI-X and FP4+ in HC-110, and my continuous tone areas have always been even.

    I felt that the UV light idea had some potential benefit, so went to hang some developed film in the window. But when I opened the window, and felt that first jolt of sub-zero(fahrenheit) air, I decided to live withe the purple cast until summer! Regarding the slight purple cast that can remain after processing, hang dry negative in an open window and the UV light will fade away the purple cast.

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    469

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    I don't know what I did wrong to get my comment mixed in with Paul Hoyts' but I did it somehow.

  10. #40
    Widows and Orphans Beware
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    177

    Re: Any real advantage to pre-soaking HP5 to remove the anti-halation layer

    The original poster asked about HP-5 and Rodinal. Maybe he's given up on getting a straight answer on that subject. I've used that combination quite a bit and never presoaked. Works just fine for me.

    I can't imagine what presoaking would do for this combination. Rodinal is best highly diluted with relatively long development times, so getting faster or smoother delivery of the developer to the film is hardly an issue. Rodinal is typically a one shot developer, so getting the antihalation layer runoff in the developer stock is not an issue. Rodinal is usually used at 20 degrees (centigrade), ie., room temperature, so "warming up" the film and tank is not a consideration.

Similar Threads

  1. Color of unclear anti-halation dye on TMY-2
    By Ed Richards in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2010, 12:46
  2. Anti-halation on E100G?
    By Calamity Jane in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2005, 00:30
  3. non anti halation films
    By Jack_5762 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 3-Sep-2005, 07:15
  4. Anti-Halation backing on TMAX 100
    By Winston Chang in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2-Dec-2000, 14:26

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •