Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Uncommon Common Lenses

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    Posts
    1,789

    Uncommon Common Lenses

    Folks,

    O.K., I have some spare time over the holidays and was thinking about some of the lenses I've tried to find over the years that were "common" lenses, or so I assumed, but never or almost never found. So share your uncommon common lens thoughts.

    The first lens I'm still looking for is a Kodak 14" Commercial Ektar with a "RO" number since that's 1956, the year I was born. Never seen one. I have an outstanding RR (1955) lens, but wondered if they made them at all in 1956.

    The second is a single coated 135mm f/5.6 Fujinon W. This is the 80 degree lens, and I looked for one fairly often on eBay and never found one until about 10 days ago. Fantastic lens, as are all of this series, but I bought the only one I've ever seen. 125mm W-series are fairly common, 150mm W series less so, and even the 250mm f/6.7 is seen fairly often. That means 135mm W-series lenses are not common even though your intuition might say otherwise. Anyone else have a 135mm single-coated Fuji-W?

    Cheers, Steve

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    133

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    There was a 14" ektar that just sold on ebay that was a pretty uncommon version of a common lens. It was mounted in a silver compound shutter. I've never seen a 14" ektar mounted in a compound shutter much less a fancy pants factory polished compound shutter (I wonder if it was standard issue for that year or some kind of kodak prototype). I placed a bid but ended up losing out on it - too bad, it might have been the prettiest shutter mounted lens I've ever come across (normally I'm not much of a sucker for the way equipment looks but this thing was gorgeous - too bad kodak eventually moved over to using Ilex shutters).

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    Posts
    1,789

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    Got a link?

    Cheers, Steve

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    133

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    I don't have a link handy (I don't know how to copy links when I'm using a phone) but I'm sure that if you did a search for "ektar" in the ebay completed auctions you would be able to find it.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Wirral, UK.
    Posts
    215

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    I have a 3 1/4 x 4 1/4 inch Gundlach Turner Reich Anastigmat mounted in a Rapax shutter. I bought the only one I have ever seen and have never heard anybody else ever mention one.

  6. #6
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    Bought from this forum an f5.3 165mm CZJ Tessar in a Compur, both made around 1926. No references in books etc but two older similar lenses have been sold on Ebay.

    Ian

  7. #7
    MIke Sherck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Elkhart, IN
    Posts
    1,312

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    I used to have a single-coated Fujinon 420mm L which was a superb performer but rather large and heavy to carry around. I sold it in favor of a 420mm RD Artar in Ilex shutter, which is also a superb performer but lighter and smaller than the Fuji. Not sure I made the right choice but I see the Fuji so rarely that "what's done is done," I think. One of my favorite focal lengths for 8x10.

    I've seen but never owned (but would like to!) the Fujinon 125mm f/8 which almost covers 8x10. I haven't seen one for sale in years.

    Mike
    Politically, aerodynamically, and fashionably incorrect.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Seattle area, WA
    Posts
    1,333

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    Curious is your single-coated Fuji 135mm 5.6 W in a Seiko shutter? Mine was (until I put the cells in a modern Copal 0). I'm wondering if they ever made these lenses in a shutter other than the Seiko. As far as performance, I have used my Fuji 135mm on 5x7 and it covers just fine.

  9. #9
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,763

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Hamley View Post
    Anyone else have a 135mm single-coated Fuji-W?

    Cheers, Steve
    I don't have that one, but I do have the 180mm Fuji-W with 80 degree coverage. I got it for 8x10 and don't see these for sale that often.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    526

    Re: Uncommon Common Lenses

    I have a 270mm G-Claron. While the G-Clarons are common, the 270mm seems to be a rare bird.
    Never is always wrong; always is never right.

    www.LostManPhoto.com
    www.MarkStahlkePhotography.com

Similar Threads

  1. 165mm Lenses - Why Is It An Uncommon Focal Length?
    By Flauvius in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 28-Oct-2012, 17:07
  2. Ries with a cracked leg; is this common
    By emo supremo in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-Jun-2009, 15:16
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-Aug-2008, 08:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •