Hi all, I've been charged with producing four to six 32"x40" (roughly) black-and-white prints using my 4x5. The budget allows for drum scanning and digital printing, so that end of the process looks like it will be as good as can be.
My question concerns which film to shoot, b/w (probably TMax 100) or color transparency (probably one of the Fuji 100 emulsions). It seems to me that the b/w is "sharper," or it appears so to me, but I don't know how much of that is actually due to grain, and I've also heard from Roger Hicks and others that b/w "breaks up" at a certain point of enlargement before color does. In other words, color's "grain" results in more of a steady degradation with increased enlargement while b/w looks better up to a point and then rapidly falls behind.
I don't mind grain (and I've enlarged enough 4x5 to know that it shows up sooner than smaller-format users assume it would!) but I'm also wondering about what characteristics of sharpness vs. smoothness (for lack of a better word) I can expect at that enlargement size from the respective film choices.
Has anybody done any real-world (scanned) comparisons of the two? Even if you haven't, which would YOU choose? By the way, being able to use Channel Mixer to vary colors before converting color scans to Monochrome is nice, but not a deciding factor in this case, nor is the prospect of "someday having the same images available in color." For that matter, the ability to develop my own b/w film to preference is also not a consideration, as my lab will develop either film any way I wish. I'm only asking about comparisons of final image quality and qualities. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Bookmarks