That's fascinating that they could get that good of quality back then. In color too!
When I first saw your heading I thought it would have to do with something like this:
http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/File:Analog_photoshop.jpg
Really cool. The user interface with all that text looks totally vintage sci-fi. It's easy to mistake the cyrillic for Klingon.
There were all kinds of photo editors pre-Photoshop and well through the mid-90s.... Freaking Scitex retouching cost mint, $1000 for a drop shadow, $2000 for cleaning up pimples.
Ah I made mint for a few years during the transition too, $400/hour easy.
Then every bozo Art Director got a copy of Photoshop and the market collapsed to basic freelance fees.
How about before there was 'before there was Photoshop':
George Hurrell photo of Joan Crawford, before retouching the negative:
After retouching the negative:
I wonder how much was soft-focusing versus actually marking the neg?
In the 80s Elizabeth Taylor's retoucher moved back home to Rochester to dry out. He was plenty busy but he retouched a few commercial shots of mine, he used pencils, air brushes, knives... probably one of the most skilled commercial artists ever. (And Elizabeth Taylor needed him by then!)
I think all those skills have been lost, I don't know anyone who is good at it. Maybe marking up an 8x10 with a pencil and Spotone but nothing on a high-end level.
Hi Marko
I was a professional photo comp artist in the 80's using rubylith, knives and register negs and pos methods.
I never thought I would go back in time, but right now we are using registration, ruby and multiple register for alt printing and those skills I gained back then are now once again being put to use thanks to digital negatives.
Never would have thought this to happen.
Bob
Bookmarks