For 4x5 urban landscapes and architecture, is there really any advantage in using a Technikardan 45s over a MT Classic or MT 3000?
The MT is a very portable and rigid camera, probably more so than the Technikardan 45s, but the Technikardan has more movements.
If you were starting from scratch it looks to be almost a tie, but if you already had a Linhof MT and oodles of Linhof accessories, would you ever consider adding a Technikardan 45s to your MT based kit?
Maybe I am just suffering from GAS, a seemingly incurable photographer's affliction.
Bookmarks