Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 73

Thread: First year Heliar's

  1. #41
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Interesting discussion.
    I, too, had heard of the Hirohito-Heliar connection as well, maybe it was in the wind.
    My own Heliar, long since sold, was from 1905 (I can't find a photo of the serial number); it was a 12" lens, uncoated, which I managed to mount on a Technika board.
    Maybe I was expecting something different, but the Heliar and I didn't get along. I'll always be thankful to the Heliar, though, as it did lead me down the path to a new Cooke that fit the bill perfectly.

  2. #42
    Scott Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Austin,TX
    Posts
    1,578

    Re: First year Heliar's

    What was the problem Ari? I will have a 12" here tomorrow... I'll see how I like it.

  3. #43
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Schroeder View Post
    What was the problem Ari? I will have a 12" here tomorrow... I'll see how I like it.
    Hi Scott,
    My copy didn't have the sharpness and contrast I was looking for. I may have had a lens whose central element needed reversing, as has been discussed here, and I may have used it under the wrong conditions sometimes (indirect sun), but I have to say, I wasn't fond of the look I got.
    I know many here produce amazing images with Heliars, that's why I got one as well.
    Had I been shooting wet plates back then, I might have kept it for that.
    I'm sure you have nothing to worry about, and your lens will prove to be a workhorse.

  4. #44
    Scott Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Austin,TX
    Posts
    1,578

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Got it yesterday....mounted it and on the GG it's soft and fuzzy everywhere....no sharpness.
    Any reason someone would scratch off the S/N? It's patent number 716035
    The individual cells all look fine. All the threading seems to be fine.
    I noticed it's best to screen the center to the outer first, then screw that into the barrel, then the inner cell.
    Otherwise the center doesn't thread all the way in.
    I can't see how the center could be reversed. It doesn't seem like that one piece will come apart. If it did there aren't any threads to reverse it anyway.
    Am I missing something here? I'd hate to send it back...

  5. #45
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Schroeder View Post
    Got it yesterday....mounted it and on the GG it's soft and fuzzy everywhere....no sharpness.
    Any reason someone would scratch off the S/N? It's patent number 716035
    The individual cells all look fine. All the threading seems to be fine.
    I noticed it's best to screen the center to the outer first, then screw that into the barrel, then the inner cell.
    Otherwise the center doesn't thread all the way in.
    I can't see how the center could be reversed. It doesn't seem like that one piece will come apart. If it did there aren't any threads to reverse it anyway.
    Am I missing something here? I'd hate to send it back...
    Oh, crap; I hope I didn't "voodoo" your lens purchase with what I said about my Heliar.
    Keep us posted if you do manage to correct the problem; some of these are very old lenses, and not everything is guaranteed to be original.

  6. #46

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    218

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Schroeder View Post
    I can't see how the center could be reversed. It doesn't seem like that one piece will come apart. If it did there aren't any threads to reverse it anyway.
    Am I missing something here? I'd hate to send it back...
    If your center element is permanently mounted in a housing that screws into place , then it cannot be reversed. The "reversal problem" only happens when the center element is easily removed from the housing, such as someone might do during a cleaning, and then put back together the wrong way. That's what happened to me with a heliar in the past. The construction changed many time over the years, so nothing can be generalized about how these are correctly assembled.

    Good luck

    Tim

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,257

    Re: First year Heliar's

    The only reason for removing the serial number is foul play, that is, theft at some time in the past.

  8. #48
    Scott Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Austin,TX
    Posts
    1,578

    Re: First year Heliar's

    I'm starting to think the serial number might have been scratched because they are mixed elements from different lenses. I've tried a number of things to no avail.

  9. #49

  10. #50
    Scott Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Austin,TX
    Posts
    1,578

    Re: First year Heliar's

    Well I tried every variation I could think of distancing the cells. It's just not happening...I'm wondering if the aperture ring is in the wrong place. I wondering that because that piece is brass and the rest are aluminum. At least it looks brass. Would this of happened? Or do I for sure have mixed parts?
    As mentioned it was the earlier patent number but the S/N is scratched off.


Similar Threads

  1. Heliars
    By Jan_6568 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 1-Dec-2006, 20:15
  2. Shooting days per year?
    By Kirk Gittings in forum On Photography
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2005, 18:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •