Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Contact printing 8X10 negs

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    171

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy View Post
    It's funny, I was so glad when I got a scanner that would handle my large negs. I was very tired of spending hours in the dark room. Now I can't wait to make some contact prints.

    Right on, Brother. --Joe

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    482

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    Quote Originally Posted by Vlad Soare View Post
    ... The only difference is that the dodge tool must be exactly the size of the dodged area, because it must be held in contact with the glass, I mean you cannot vary the dodged area's size by moving the tool up or down, like you can do under an enlarger. The same stands for burning. ...
    Why not? I can't see why raising a dodging tool a few inches would cause any problem, but maybe I'm missing something. Can you elaborate?

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Barcelona/Spain
    Posts
    1,403

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    hey Vlad, where do you get your Lodima, US or EU?

  4. #14
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    the only place to get Lodima anywhere, unless its 2nd hand, is from M+P themselves.

    http://store.michaelandpaula.com/ind...=index&cPath=1

    -Dan

  5. #15
    Vlad Soare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    466

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    ... The only difference is that the dodge tool must be exactly the size of the dodged area, because it must be held in contact with the glass, I mean you cannot vary the dodged area's size by moving the tool up or down, like you can do under an enlarger. The same stands for burning. ...
    Why not? I can't see why raising a dodging tool a few inches would cause any problem, but maybe I'm missing something. Can you elaborate?
    Because the light coming from a bare bulb isn't collimated, like the one that's projected through a lens. If you raise the dodge tool, the area underneath it will still receive some stray light. The dodge tool will make just a penumbra, not a true shadow.

    hey Vlad, where do you get your Lodima, US or EU?
    I've got it directly from Michael Smith. This time I was lucky, he gave it to me in person, but next time I'll have to order it via his web site. I believe he can arrange to have it shipped from a European location, so we pay lower postage and no customs.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Barcelona/Spain
    Posts
    1,403

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    Quote Originally Posted by Vlad Soare View Post
    I believe he can arrange to have it shipped from a European location, so we pay lower postage and no customs.
    Awesome! Shipping and customs was one of my worries apart from x-ray... although I've read people from the UK who had no problems with it (only customs.)

    I can't wait to start contact printing again.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    I've used a painter's light from a hardware store to good effect, but an enlarger is more convenient if there is no place to hang the painter's light from.
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  8. #18
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,397

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    A small f-stop under an enlarging lens will act much like a point light source and allow crisp dodging and burning, but of course, might also diminish the light a bit too
    much for convenient printing of slower papers like Azo. A high quality contact frame
    will work just as well as a vacuum frame, but these aren't easy to come by. I use the same 8X10 Condit masking frame that I use for making duplicate transparencies,
    which is a far more demanding application than contact printing per se, and the results are superb. It is also a myth that high quality contact prints can only be made with special papers. Ordinary projection papers are capable of excellent results if your film is developed appropriately. Slower silver chloride papers like Azo or Lodima have some special characteristics which make them their own look, especially with respect to microcontrast in the midtones and so forth, but learning to contact print well does not necessarily require these papers. It's certainly nice that
    we have the option of them once again, however.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Westport Island, Maine
    Posts
    1,236

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    In my experience, a small f-stop under an enlarger (45MX/Cold Light, LPL) doesn't work for Azo at all. Nor does a big f-stop. I barely get an image with 5-minute exposures. I can use my enlargers as Azo light sources if I remove the lens and lensboard and just blast away, and even then exposure times can be long (90 seconds). Just bought 300W bulbs to hang and use instead. Much more workable for the impatient.

    Were I just learning, I'd use cheap RC like I use for proofing, just to get the hang of it. They'll be just fine. Save the really good stuff when I'm familiar for the best of negs. Yes, there may be development time differences for RC vs. Lodima or Azo, but if I'm just learning that becomes part of the learning process.

    On the other hand, life's too short to use less than the best...and grinding my way through on Lodima helps support Michael and Paula, because then I need to buy more.

    Either way, 8x10 contact prints are delicious, and I find them easier to print than enlargements from 4x5.
    Bruce Barlow
    author of "Finely Focused" and "Exercises in Photographic Composition"
    www.brucewbarlow.com

  10. #20
    Vlad Soare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    466

    Re: Contact printing 8X10 negs

    I find them easier to print than enlargements from 4x5.
    Yup. So do I. Not only easier, but also much faster, which is a great boon when one's only time for darkroom work is when the kids are asleep.

    The suggestion of learning on cheap RC paper is a sound one, but it's a double-edged sword. If one tries to learn on a paper that's incapable of looking good, then one might start to question the benefits of contact printing. I got better pictures from 6x7 enlarged on FB than I could ever get with 8x10 contact printed on RC. If I hadn't seen prints made on Lodima with my own eyes, I would have never taken up 8x10.

Similar Threads

  1. Printing and/or enlarging Whole-Plate and other "larger" format negs
    By ditkoofseppala in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2007, 18:28
  2. Contact printing for dummies
    By Jim Rice in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 4-Jun-2006, 16:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •