Nude

[gevalia]

Anna.

Liquid emulsion on heavy paper.
Pol 665 pos/neg.

Wicked cool eyes.

[Nathan Appel]

fuji fp100c45 handmade camera fujinon 125mm 5.6W

[Asher Kelman]

fuji fp100c45 handmade camera fujinon 125mm 5.6W

Nathan,

I really like the image. Is there a way you can post a much larger image as one needs size here to really appreciate all the design and effort you made. You obviously thought about this shot a lot. You planned this, did the work and it came out well. So in your mind it might immediately reignite the feelings and experience you had when you saw your big print. We, however, have only your picture!

Thanks so much for sharing!

Asher

[Vaughn]

Asher -- just click on the image and zoom to a large size. I can see his image at any size I want. (using Firefox -- on a PC or a Mac)

Vaughn

[Asher Kelman]

Asher -- just click on the image and zoom to a large size. I can see his image at any size I want. (using Firefox -- on a PC or a Mac)

Vaughn

Vaughn,

Of course one can zoom, but that doesn't call in extra pixels so the image becomes progressively soft and breaks up. The native size is just too small for the quality of the picture to be really appreciated.

Asher

[Leigh]

I must agree with Asher.

The vast majority of photos in this thread are large, of good quality, so the technique and intent can be appreciated. That doesn't happen with small images.

- Leigh

[Vaughn]

Asher, Leigh -- good points. But in the end they are still just images on a computer screen.

[Asher Kelman]

Asher, Leigh -- good points. But in the end they are still just images on a computer screen.

Well, just for the record, my screen is able to reproduce very well the entire gamut of any photo put up here. The large pictures really do show their quality. Of course they don't have the presence of a print but can come pretty close to giving 98% of the experience.

Asher

[Leigh]

But in the end they are still just images on a computer screen.

If you consider the medium to be so inferior, why bother to post in the first place?

- Leigh

[Jay DeFehr]

Asher,

We're 98% genetically identical to Chimpanzees. Sometimes 2% can be significant.