I must be missing something - why a 5x8 body if you are using 13x18/5x7 holders????
I must be missing something - why a 5x8 body if you are using 13x18/5x7 holders????
aptitude perhaps ?
Isn't there a place I can edit? Sheesh...looked up the word and it's exactly the opposite of what I meant of course. I was looking for a word that was something that defines a person that has great wisdom/craftsmanship/exacting type of methodology with what he does both in camera making and 20X24 photoshoots
Sorry about that and I wish I could go back somehow and change that to a proper word to describe what I was attempting to state about the designer.
I have 5X8 holders. But the 5X8 back enables me to use a trick that Jiri and I'm sure many others have used to permit convenient use of 5X7 or 13cmX18cm holders. I would have definitely been entirely INEPT if my goal of compact meant making a camera larger than it should be)
I just found a Marvel (Waterbury) 5x8 camera complete with lens, one holder and the original case. The camera is a 9 out of 10. Everything looks brand new. The asking price is $150. I am seriously thinking of purchasing the camera. Any one have experience with the Waterbury?
Jiri Vasina
www.vasina.net
@ Google+ | @ Facebook | @ flickr
My books @ Blurb (only heavily outdated "Serene Landscape").
I shoot 5x8 sometimes, using the dividing board in a Deardorff V8.
I like the aspect ratio for certain scenes. It also gives me two negative sizes for a weight penalty of perhaps 3 ounces, as well as 4 shots per 8x10 filmholder.
4x10 can be nice, too.
One man's Mede is another man's Persian.
Bookmarks