Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

  1. #1

    Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

    I have two 4x5 Linhof cameras and am going to sell one. For this reason I have t wo "normal" lenses: A Symmar 150 / 265mm lens and a Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens. Which should I keep? I normally shoot barns and scenery. Since those are all i n daylight and I have the super screen I don't need the f 3.5 unless it is a bet ter lens.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

    My Technika Xenotar is one of the sharpest lenses I've ever used. I'd keep it.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  3. #3

    Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

    Well Robert, it is really a personal decision. The lenses are close in focal lenth its true but perhaps more important, what kind of an image do these lenses create. Are there any differences in sharpness, tonality etc...??? If so, what do you like best...??? Its your decision that counts...

    If photography is a way of self expression we must - each and every one of us - decide for ourselves what is best...Someone may prefer to shoot through a coke bottle - and get something that no one has seen before...etc...

    What would I do...??? Probably keep both for awhile and see if I found a preference...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    255

    Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

    Robert,

    I have a 135mm Planar f/3.5 and 150mm Symmar f/5.6. The Planar is the equivilant of your Xenotar. If you can only keep one than I would base the decision on the type of shooting that I do. If you use the camera hand held for straight shooting (w/o movements), than I would keep the Xenotar because it is faster and yields a slightly wider angle and depth of field. Use of movements will be very limited though. The Symmar offers a large image circle, so you could use of the movements on your Linhof and could still use the camera for hand held use...you'll just be limited by 1 1/2 stops. Image quality is good with both lenses, so I doubt you would be disappointed either way (do some side by side shots with both lenses and decide for yourself which one you like better). Good luck.

    Best regards,

    J. P. Mose

  5. #5
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Symmar 150 / 265mm lens v. Xenotar 3.5 135mm lens

    Have you ever used, or can you conceive of ever using the 150/265 as a 265mm f:12? If so, that should be taken into concideration. I have both a Planar 135mm and a Symmar 150/265mm, but that's mostly because I bought my camera (with lenses) a few months ago and haven't really got around to playing with it yet...

Similar Threads

  1. Schneider Apo-Symmar 120 mm lens-lens board mounting problem
    By L. Klapstock in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2-Nov-2011, 14:27
  2. Schneider 135mm Symmar-S lens rear element
    By Tom Simpson in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Jul-2005, 16:52
  3. help in choosing 135mm lens
    By mo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 3-Nov-2003, 13:57
  4. Using a 135mm Schneider Enlarging Lens as a Camera Lens
    By Chris Engholm in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 4-Dec-2001, 23:20
  5. Schneider Xenotar 135mm f3.5 lens
    By Paul Taylor in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-Sep-1998, 01:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •