Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

  1. #1
    Remember to take out the trash
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Finland via Amsterdam
    Posts
    153

    Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    I finally did it: bought an LF camera after hunting for a particular model for well over a year. Been mostly lurking here and thanks for all the inspiration and guidance. More on the beauty when she arrives..

    It's been a few years since I've shot 35mm and 6x6 film, and was wondering what is the current view on "best" 4x5 transparency films to be drum scanned.

    I used to shoot Velvia 50 exclusively, but moved to Provia when I started scanning as the service I used was having hard time with deep shadows, and at the time I heard others lamenting the same with Velvia scans. Is Provia the best choice for color landscapes and cityscapes?

    My main reason for LF is portraits and glamour, though. Having very limited experience with film and skintones, what would you recommend for the most pleasing skin tones in the studio? Transparency or negative?

    Finally, if anyone knows of a reliable and quality drum scanning service in Europe I'd appreciate pointers.

  2. #2
    Remember to take out the trash
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Finland via Amsterdam
    Posts
    153

    Re: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    Sorry double post, please delete this one.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    san francisco
    Posts
    118

    Re: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    I'm not as qualified as others here to answer, but in general it seems:
    - portraits are best done on negative film
    - neutral colors preferably (no Velvia 50!)
    - something like a Kodak Portra 400NC is probably common, as would be Fuji 160S

    enjoy your return to film! You're back in the company of many who never left it. :-)

  4. #4
    ki6mf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    593

    Re: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    If you go the color negative route I would also look over the Kodak Portra 160 and the New Ektar 100 or if using Fuji the Pro 160 S
    Wally Brooks

    Everything is Analog!
    Any Fool Can Shoot Digital!
    Any Coward can shoot a zoom! Use primes and get closer.

  5. #5
    Lachlan 717
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,596

    Re: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    Consider Astia for transparency portraits.
    Lachlan.

    You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -- Wayne Gretzky

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    111

    Re: Going back to film, 1st LF camera

    I used to shoot KODAK Ektachrome EPP100 because it was the most neutral film on the market. I never really liked PROVIA because it was too warm for skin tones. After those, KODAK released Ektachrome GX and I only had a few chances to test since at the time I went digital, it looked very promising and way better than EPP. More latitude and better grain. I wonder how EKTAR 100 fares with portraiture. I would love to try it but I can't develop color film,...yet.
    Sergio

    My website

Similar Threads

  1. The hopeful future of film photography
    By Ed Eubanks in forum On Photography
    Replies: 414
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2011, 07:41
  2. 4x5 Ultra Fine Focusing and Calibration
    By rvhalejr in forum New Products and Services
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 11-Dec-2009, 18:26
  3. Replies: 86
    Last Post: 2-Aug-2009, 21:05
  4. Art Panorama 6 x 17 back - anyone familiar?
    By Robert McClure in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-Jul-2006, 02:53
  5. 8K film recorders for repro vs. original film
    By bglick in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2005, 10:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •