Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Developer for Portraits

  1. #1
    Hack Pawlowski6132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Detroit - Come Visit
    Posts
    923

    Developer for Portraits

    Currently using TMY2 or TXP for portrait work. Developing in Xtol. Using Ilford MG FB Warmtone. No real complaints but wondering if I can gain some more tonal gradation (I don't think I'm articulating this correctly)? In other words, I'm not interested in maximizing contrast range or sharpness but, want beautiful tones.

    I'm willing to try to mix my own if you have some good forumulas.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    510-Pyro is my favorite portrait developer, and until recently, I would have recommended it without hesitation, but...GSD-10 might be a better option for printing on VC papers. GSD-10 is a simple, glycin-only developer formulated for stand (or low agitation frequency) development of modern films, but it also works very well with standard intermittent or rotary development. Expose at box speed, or a little higher for best results. I'm afraid the only LF example I have online is not a portrait, and not my work, but that of Jim Byers. It demonstrates the sharpness, grain structure and gradation of the film/developer combination very well.

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vQiBpnvmQM...p3+1200dpi.jpg

    Film: Forte 200
    Developer: GSD-10
    Dilution: 1:30
    Time: 56 minutes
    Temp: 77F
    Agitation: 10 seconds/ 9 minutes

    GSD-10

    Distilled water 750ml
    sodium sulfite 50g
    sodium carbonate 75g
    distilled water to 1 liter

    Dilute 1+4 - 1+29

  3. #3
    Scott Davis
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    I've been very happy with Pyrocat HD. Soup at 1:1:100.

  4. #4
    Hack Pawlowski6132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Detroit - Come Visit
    Posts
    923

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    I heard Pyro is very toxic/caustic to mix. True?

    GSD-10, stand developer, do you know how much developer is needed per 80 sq in? I'm wondering how many 4x5 hangers I can use in my old hard rubber kodak tank. That's the method commonly employed for stand developing?? Or, usually one of the Yankee variety of tanks so I don't have to sit in the dark for an hour.

  5. #5
    David de Gruyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    278

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    Jay,

    How do you determine developing time on GSD-10? It seems to me that 56 minutes is a meaningless distinction from, for example, 60 minutes. (I know, it is not your work).

    I just realized that I have all of the chemistry in my closet at the moment, so I might try it. It is just that film testing is so expensive and time consuming without a starting point.

  6. #6
    David de Gruyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    278

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    For 4x5, I use a daylight tank (HP Combiplan) for stand developing. For 8x10, I have been using BTZS tubes, but I have been slowly transitioning to dip and dunk.

    I will let Jay reveal his method.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    David,

    Jim derived his 56 minute development time in a very practical, methodical way. He chose the 1:30 dilution for economy, and determined 9 minutes as the minimum safe agitation frequency for that film, so: 1 minute initial agitation + 6 periods of 9 minutes development + 6 10second agitation intervals = 56minutes. He previously determined his development time at 70F, but it was too long for his liking, so he increased the temperature to 77F, and knocked off one or two of the development periods, thus arriving at the above. There is more developing info at the blog:

    http://gsd-10.blogspot.com/

    Pawlowski,

    I'm not sure of the absolute minimum requirement of GSD-stock/ 8x10, but I know 30ml is safe. While I've had very few problems with stand development, I have seen streaking with some films, as in Jim's example at the blog. Stand development is always risky, and its benefits should be weighed against these risks. For instance, Jim could see no compromise in sharpness with 9 minute development periods compared to stand development, and this low frequency agitation was enough to prevent any streaking or uneven development. I've always used GSD-10 one-shot, but it might make a very nice large tank developer, too, since glycin solutions are known to resist oxidation and have very long shelf/tank lives. Since GSD-10 contains no bromide, one could theoretically use the stock solution to replenish the working developer, but I haven't worked out a replenishment rate.

    I think David is referring above to my very low budget method of developing single sheets in black plastic bags. Essentially, I put a negative in one of the black bags my film or paper are packaged in, pour in the developer, fold over the top, and float the black bag in a tray of tempered water. This method is very safe, regarding scratches, etc, and economical, as it requires a very low volume of solution, once all the air is squeezed out of the bag. I'm working on evolving this primitive method into a practical technique for general use, but it's not quite ready yet.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    Thanks to KOG for catching a fairly critical omission from my posted formula! It should read:

    GSD-10

    Distilled water 750ml
    sodium sulfite 50g
    sodium carbonate 75g
    glycin 10g

    distilled water to 1 liter

    Dilute 1+4 - 1+29

  9. #9
    Nicholas O. Lindan
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    466

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    Developer won't give you 'more beautiful tones'. Improving the lighting will. Portraiture is 70% rapport with the subject, 29% lighting and 1% technical stuff - of which 0.01% is the choice of film developer.

    Oh, I don't know. Maybe I am overstating the importance of the developer...

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,545

    Re: Developer for Portraits

    Quote Originally Posted by nolindan View Post
    Developer won't give you 'more beautiful tones'. Improving the lighting will. Portraiture is 70% rapport with the subject, 29% lighting and 1% technical stuff - of which 0.01% is the choice of film developer.

    Oh, I don't know. Maybe I am overstating the importance of the developer...
    I agree completely.

Similar Threads

  1. Old Formulas: Paper
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 20-Oct-2006, 00:48
  2. Film holders and developer contamination
    By Philip Aragon in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8-May-2005, 07:27
  3. Old Formulas : Film
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19-Mar-2005, 21:31
  4. Developer shelf life
    By Neal Shields in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22-Jul-2004, 09:43
  5. Developer Quantity
    By Ron Bose in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2004, 10:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •