Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: phillips compact ii: worth it?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    55

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    i drove down to samy's this afternoon to look at their 8x10 cameras. they have one deardorff in what would be bargain condition at keh, and one new canham traditional. i liked how the dearforff handled, but of course it was heavy and it would be hard to find one in good condition. i vaguely remember that it costs $2500 to have one professionally restored, but i'm probably wrong.

    despite mike johnston's opinion, i didn't really like how the canham traditional handled, especially the levers for extending the front bed. they're on the inner side of the rail and all the way in the back. i also didn't like the t-knobs for front rise and tilt. they don't align themselves to give each other room. the swing/shift mechanism is brilliant, though.

    today's real find was the mqc57. true, the rear standard flexes when you nudge it with a finger, but it was not finicky at all. the bed was also completely rigid when fully extended. the jmc810 has support struts on the rear standard like the traditional, so i'm guessing it doesn't flex like the mqc57. if the phillips compact ii goes for over $4000, i think the jmc810 would do the trick!

  2. #12
    Big Bend
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    367

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    Just in case you didn't see it, there's a 7x17 in the classifieds right now, with holders, lens, tripod, film, etc. for that kind of money. I know I'm not you, but if I were......
    No affiliation with the seller BTW.

  3. #13
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,762

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    If you are in the market for a Phillips-style 8x10, Don't forget the Shen Hao FCL810. It is a little heavier than the Chamonix and Phillips, but it also has base tilt on the front standard the the other two don't have.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Homewood, IL
    Posts
    178

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    One of the main reasons there is less flex in the rear standard of the JMC810 than in the MQC57 or DLC45 is that the JMC810 rear standard has no swing or shift, only tilt.
    Last edited by Rick Moore; 20-May-2010 at 14:05. Reason: Corrected tortured grammar

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    55

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    i think it's the lack of support struts that allows the back to flex more on the mqc57 (and dlc45). the swing/shift mechanism itself is really solid.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    55

    Re: phillips compact ii: worth it?

    $5,655.55

    tried and lost.

    can't really complain. that's damned expensive.

Similar Threads

  1. 480 mm on Phillips Compact II
    By jens peter in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-Aug-2009, 20:18
  2. Phillips Compact 8x10 and wideangle lenses
    By John Ford in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2005, 16:06
  3. Cold weather 8x10 (+4x5) photogrpahy (Phillips Compact II)
    By tim atherton in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 26-Jan-2004, 11:51
  4. Phillips Compact II and quick release plates for Arca Monoball
    By J.S in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2004, 11:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •