See this series of comparisons by Armin Seeholzer. It should keep you busy.
Garrett
flickr galleries
Fantastic Ramiro!!!
Baone (PD) Italy - Portrait of a motorcyclist with his custom bike.
- Camera: Fatif Luxi Special Studio 13x18 (1959)
- Lens: Voigtlander Heliar 210 1:4.5 in Compound shutter
- Exposure: around 1/2 second and f 5.6
- Film: HARMAN FB Direct Positive Paper - 3 ASA - size 5x7"
- Developer: ILFORD PQ UNIVERSAL 1+15 - 4 minutes at 20° C
- Stop: ILFORD ILFO STOP
- Fixer: ILFORD RAPID FIXER
- Lightmeter: Gossen Lunasix 3 reading the incident light.
- Lightning: Ambient light only.
- Scanner: EPSON V700 and EPSON Scan 3.81
- Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4
Baone (PD) Italy - Portrait of Federica Benfatto with a custom bike.
- Camera: Fatif Luxi Special Studio 13x18 (1959)
- Lens: Voigtlander Heliar 210 1:4.5 in Compound shutter
- Exposure: around 1/2 second and f 5.6
- Film: HARMAN FB Direct Positive Paper - 3 ASA - size 5x7"
- Developer: ILFORD PQ UNIVERSAL 1+15 - 4 minutes at 20° C
- Stop: ILFORD ILFO STOP
- Fixer: ILFORD RAPID FIXER
- Lightmeter: Gossen Lunasix 3 reading the incident light.
- Lightning: Ambient light only.
- Scanner: EPSON V700 and EPSON Scan 3.81
- Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4
I submit this image with a question. I have trade my 240/4.5 Heliar for another one 210/4.5 Heliar Linhof selected...
The 210 has very small separation on the front. If there is a problem when taking a picture what it will be?
This is at f4.5 HP5+@200 in APH Adox 1+50 for 11 minutes
Bigger here
http://cjoint.com/14av/DDDo5E9WZMh_scan0001.jpg
www.christo.stankulov.com
Mine is a 210mm and also has a big deal of separation. I don't think one can ever see real problems in the images produced, unless you do a side by side test. Even then, I am not sure you could tell the difference.
Yes, Ramiro, I agree. And I am amazed with the sharpness at f 4,5 ...
www.christo.stankulov.com
Bookmarks