Folks,
Not to beat a dead horse to death but ask a couple of bokeh/soft focus questions that I’m going to try and learn about. I don’t want to rehash this-lens-versus-that-lens, but other factors that may affect bokeh or soft focus effects in a given lens, which I'm starting to believe are as significant as which lens you use.
In a past post, either myself or someone made a comment that Fujinon lenses didn’t have the best bokeh (transition to OOF), and Ken Lee kindly posted some photos - still lifes I believe, in flat light - with beautiful bokeh taken with Fujinon lenses.
So #1: Does bokeh vary in the same lens depending on magnification, likely because of DOF? In other words, would a lens with neutral or “bad” bokeh at distance/infinity be better close up? I've noticed that seems to be true in my own photography
Next, I’ve noted that soft focus lenses seem to be softer when focused closer. So #2: Anyone else notice a similar effect?
Anyone care to propose a test situation?
Finally, with respect to Struan Gray’s post about what qualities portrait lenses should have in the other thread, I was conversing with an 87-year old photographer friend, and he mentioned that he liked a 300mm f:4.5 Leitmeyer because it had a fast aperture for DOF control and little distortion near the edges. I notice that I haven’t heard distortion near edges mentioned WRT portrait lenses, but apparently Harley was more sensitive to what ears were doing than we are.
Cheers, Steve
Bookmarks