Page 293 of 655 FirstFirst ... 193243283291292293294295303343393 ... LastLast
Results 2,921 to 2,930 of 6546

Thread: Use of X-ray film: technical discussion with example images

  1. #2921

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Noel View Post
    Detergents, Photo flo and LFN are all surfactants so they all have the quality of causing water to sheet off surfaces.
    yup. Basically anything that can change surface tension of water seems to work nicely. PhotoFlo , i guess, is more clear solution than our average soapy things at households, but i have not yet seen much of difference to switch back. Plus i can always use same stuff to wash off basin and dishes afterwards Win win..

  2. #2922
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,518

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    I don't have wife, no room.

    Kodak sunk their own ship.

    Quote Originally Posted by SergeiR View Post
    I kept running out of it and there is no longer any stores in Dallas or nearby that carry stuff. And i don't have huge storage space its bad enough i can't park car in garage with all the … stuff.. i have - costumes, light stands , camera bits and pieces My wife is patient about it, but i don't want to push it Or she will stop posing for me
    Tin Can

  3. #2923

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    158

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    So, with my mediocre results shooting on some mystery Kodak x-ray film (seems like blotchy patches of low contrast), I tried stripping the emulsion on the other side. And trying to be systematic I took three frames and stripped the back and the front on one each.



    This is with fixed scanner exposure. The backside is really blurry. Viewing the front+back sheet this creates areas of reduced contrast. So not local micro-contrast, but impaired medium radius contrast. Like a halo.

    Here’s a GIF that switches between kind of equalized versions



    I think I will strip always from now on. I found a method that is really quick. Take a tray, put two sheets of toilet paper on the bottom. Soak the TP with 3-4ml of bleach. Drop the sheet on top of that and move sheet around with gloved fingers. The emulsion is stripped in 10-20 seconds, no mess, no tape, no glass plate. Just rinse of the back first.

  4. #2924

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Quote Originally Posted by SergeiR View Post
    yup. Basically anything that can change surface tension of water seems to work nicely. PhotoFlo , i guess, is more clear solution than our average soapy things at households, but i have not yet seen much of difference to switch back. Plus i can always use same stuff to wash off basin and dishes afterwards Win win..
    What about the effects on archival, isn't dish soap a corrosive of some kind?

  5. #2925

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    5,308

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Quote Originally Posted by SergeiR View Post
    I kept running out of it and there is no longer any stores in Dallas or nearby that carry stuff. And i don't have huge storage space its bad enough i can't park car in garage with all the … stuff.. i have - costumes, light stands , camera bits and pieces My wife is patient about it, but i don't want to push it Or she will stop posing for me
    Running out? I have an edwal brand dropper and over 3 years and never run out, only getting close now, I have a whole bottle of kodak stuff, I expect it to last me my entire life....

  6. #2926

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    Running out? I have an edwal brand dropper and over 3 years and never run out, only getting close now, I have a whole bottle of kodak stuff, I expect it to last me my entire life....
    When i am "on the roll" - i shoot 100-200 sheets in a month of 8x10 alone. Add there some occasional roll film and stuff. And i don't reuse final rinse solutions (only fixer is reused). So yep. I did ran out of it on times when it was not convenient.

    As of archival - i am not sure i care for negatives to be here in 50 years, b/c i know i would not be. But i know that i don't see any problems with film and X-ray film that been done 2 years ago (just re-scanned some stuff from 1.5 years ago recently). So - who knows. I prefer to keep huge tiffs of my scans, knowing full well that i can print out 8x10 negative from them and storage is far less consuming (that said - i do keep good negatives, and it eats up space like crazy ()

  7. #2927

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    158

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Here’s two more examples of stripped versus unstripped. Is it my film (pretty much unidentified: it says Definix Medical on the envelope and KODAK XDM on the edge) that exhibits this large blurry cross-talk from the rear emulsion? Some people here said that stripping gives insignificant benefit. Are they using more modern film?



  8. #2928
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Unstripped, x-ray film has never given me sharp carbon prints.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  9. #2929
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,150

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Excellent examples, towolf.

  10. #2930

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    towolf....

    I knew there had to be another great use for toilet paper! Shooting 11x14, I'll probably use some large 3M paper towels I have in the darkroom and soak 'em with bleach and try your method. Thanks for the images dancing back and forth as it is obvious the backing takes away such a large degree of apparent sharpness. It appears that a slight bump in exposure might make up for the removed backing, eh? Thanks for the post.

Similar Threads

  1. Technical Pan Film
    By Jehu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2016, 18:42
  2. Images, not technical discussions.
    By rdenney in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 14:16
  3. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 12:01
  4. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  5. Discussion: Pyro stain, silver rich film & thick emulsion
    By Pete Caluori in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2003, 04:39

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •