Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: A reciprocity cry for help.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Germany/USA
    Posts
    141

    A reciprocity cry for help.

    so I am new to LF and am using 4x5 Foma 100 (live in Germany so it is inexpensive). We took the camera out yesterday and it was a bumbling affair, no light meter, no watch, only a slight understanding of recip, and then the battery died in our Rollei...All in all an eventful day. with the DSLR we metered a shot for ISO 100, f22 at 15 secs and then my brain started to fry.

    I am technical in nature...doing IT for a living and used to fly for the US Army but when I look at Foma's chart:

    Schwarzschild effect
    Exposure (seconds) 1/1000–1/2 1 10 100
    Lengthening of exposure 1x 2x 8x 16x
    Correction of aperture number 0 -1 -3 -4

    I get that the exposure is a factor of ten but I have no idea how to fill in the blank spaces between 1, 10 and 100 seconds. I have scrounged the forum here and have read quite a bit on outside forums/websites that talk one through reciprocity so I grasp what is going on and why this is an issue but for the life of me I am not having the light bulb moment that will enable me to figure this out on my own.

    So I am approaching the forum, with me hat in hand, and am begging someone out there to enlighten me, provide a spark of some sort, so I can get through this and make some reciprocity charts.

    Many thanks

    Erick

  2. #2
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    How about putting the numbers on a graph and using it to get the in between times?

    Vaughn

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Germany/USA
    Posts
    141

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    that would work? for some stupid reason I was hung up that it was a logarithmic curve line...time to make some graph paper or buy it in the morning.

    Is it that easy?

    Thanks

    ./e

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    Quote Originally Posted by 77seriesiii View Post
    Is it that easy?
    Probably. See how the numbers fit on a graph. If it gives a reasonable-looking curve between the known values, you'll be safe enough interpolating.

  5. #5
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    Quote Originally Posted by 77seriesiii View Post
    Is it that easy?./e
    NO... I just tried to graph it several ways with no real luck -- found out I forgotten much of my math and graphing!

    I have a list of corrected times for Tri-X that Michale Kenna worked out -- if anyone knows long exposures, he does!

    Skipping some of his numbers...(first is metered exposure/second in corrected exposure)

    2sec/4sec.....10sec/50sec....40sec/240sec(4.5min)...80sec/630sec(10.5min)...3min/25min
    6min/60min...10min/120min...20min/4hours...40min/8hours


    Many of my exposures under the redwoods tend to be in the 5 to 30 minute range -- no wonder my shadows tend to drop out sometimes...LOL!

    Vaughn

  6. #6
    Downstairs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,449

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    Wallace is probably right in the real world of recipricity before TMax. (I am repeating myself, sorry) Once you are over a minute, anything goes; so a sixy second exposure and a sixty minute exposure both look good - but just a little different. I do it with T film and go and have lunch while the film does it's work. Stopping down and shooting long exposures keeps you out of trouble.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,408

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    Erick,

    Here is a graph I made in Microsoft Word for Fomapan 100 reciprocity corrections. The values are extrapolated from the (scant) data that is found in the Foma data sheet. The file was too large to upload as a simple Word document, so I've put it in a .zip file

    I've changed the values to full stops as they read on the meter to make things easier to apply. Intermediate values can be estimated. These are not exact, but within a fraction of a stop (i.e., close enough).

    Hope this helps

    Doremus Scudder

  8. #8
    Wayne venchka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,872

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    I can't help your aching head or fill in any blanks except to say that apparently Foma film has terrible recirocity compared to other films. I'm heading out this weekend with my first batch of Foma 200.

    Good luck!
    Wayne
    Deep in the darkest heart of the North Carolina rainforest.

    Wayne's Blog

    FlickrMyBookFaceTwitSpacei

  9. #9

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    also keep in mind with photography everything is usally measured in stops and a stop is simply double or half the light of the stop below or above it.

    So in looking at your Foma numbers the difference between 10 seconds and 100 seconds is only 1 stop. In the real world (with B&W film anyway) you will not notice much if any difference if you are a stop off.

    I use a lot of film from Eastern Europe and for what it is worth I always err on the side of more exposure not less.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    324

    Re: A reciprocity cry for help.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wallace_Billingham View Post
    also keep in mind with photography everything is usally measured in stops and a stop is simply double or half the light of the stop below or above it.

    So in looking at your Foma numbers the difference between 10 seconds and 100 seconds is only 1 stop.................. ????
    I didn’t study NEW MATH but using old math, 10 seconds to 100 seconds is 3 ¼ stops.
    Jerome

Similar Threads

  1. Reciprocity issues
    By Scott Kathe in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 8-May-2008, 13:12
  2. Testing For Reciprocity
    By neil poulsen in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-Jun-2007, 16:17
  3. need better reciprocity characteristics
    By Bruce Watson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2006, 14:14
  4. Reciprocity, Contrast & Adjacency
    By Annie M. in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 17-Aug-2004, 18:38
  5. Zone System & Reciprocity Failure
    By Andrew Pell in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 16-Apr-2001, 00:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •