> This was the shot where I figured out why those little 135mm lenses are so cheap.
As in, limited coverage? At least they're not very heavy to lug around
Great images once again, keep them coming!
> This was the shot where I figured out why those little 135mm lenses are so cheap.
As in, limited coverage? At least they're not very heavy to lug around
Great images once again, keep them coming!
Yeah coverage is the isssue, and I really don't see much difference with field of view 150mm>135mm.
A cheap experiment, I suppose. if anyone wants a 135mm schneider hit me up :P
Nice tones and exposures Alex! I really like the series of cranes.
I never did much like the limitations of the 135mm focal length. If you like "slightly wide" lenses and want a ton of coverage, the 120mm f/8 Nikkor can cover 8x10, so it has pretty much unlimited coverage...as long as you don't mind the larger size. Pretty cheap too relative to its capability.
Nah thanks, I got one It's pretty limited in terms of movements, although it's usable. I also find the one I have (Xenar f/4.7) gets decidedly soft towards the corners. Still, the angle is quite nice and it's very light weight. When I got it, I sort of assumed that it would be unusable (also because the shutter was stuck, but I managed to get it unstuck), but I'm pleasantly surprised. Movements are just enough for most scenes and center sharpness is quite good, it seems.
Dolomites 2 by Fredrick D. Fjeldsbø, on Flickr
Bookmarks