Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

  1. #31

    Re: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

    Gordon,

    One benefit to the direct mentod is that you don't have to deal with bubbles between the overlay material and the film, so it simplifys that a bit, and it reduces the number of layers/interfaces that need to be clean, etc.

    I don't use a dam. It doesn't take much liquid to do the mounting or cleaning, so I don't have any problems with the liquids flowing around. There just isn't any to get out of hand as long as you use an appropriate amount.

    The Prazio kit and the other Prazio products come with nice squeeze bottles that put out a nice controlled amount of liquid. Highly recommended for this use. No chance of spills.


    ---Michael


    ---Michael

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

    Michael (and Gordon)- Thanks so much for taking the time to explain your technique. I honestly didn't know where to start with trying fluid mounting with the M1. I've had some problems with Newton's rings on 8x10 negatives, so there really isn't another option than doing a fluid mount. Ted Harris also recommended the Prazio starter kit, so I need to give them a call.

  3. #33
    Wayne venchka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,872

    Re: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

    Let me add my thanks as well.
    Wayne
    Deep in the darkest heart of the North Carolina rainforest.

    Wayne's Blog

    FlickrMyBookFaceTwitSpacei

  4. #34

    Re: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

    Barry,

    Try the anti-newton spray that Prazio makes. That's how I scanned large negs on the drum scanner, and it made no substantial difference up to about 800-1200spi. Above that, you'd probably want to wet mount.

    ---Michael

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    338

    Re: Microtek M1: A Review by Mac Holbert/Nash Editions

    Quote Originally Posted by Van Camper View Post
    Shees, they appear to be more interested in writing an article rather then determining proper test procedures.

    Unfortunately, I think that their primary motivation is actually to justify the amount of money that they've spent on digital backs and such, rather than to make an honest comparison between digital and film.

    "See, if we put large weights on the legs of our competitor's horses, ours are faster. Therefore ours are the best!"

    Sigh.

Similar Threads

  1. Opening Mac made PS images in PC?
    By Deliberate1 in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-Oct-2008, 00:27
  2. New Microtek M1 review
    By Harley Goldman in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2008, 05:37
  3. Microtek M1 Review
    By Rob Landry in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 15-Feb-2008, 10:18
  4. New Computer Recommendation
    By Peter Lewin in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 2-Jun-2007, 18:43
  5. Microtek Scanmaker i900 Review
    By Jeffrey Zweig in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 16-Sep-2004, 05:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •